m Bedivere moved page User talk:Bedivere/archivetoUser talk:Bedivere/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect
|
|
(No difference)
|
![]() |
File:Canciller Andrés Allamand participa del saludo protocolar al Presidente de Bolivia, Luis Arce, y al Vicepresidente, David Choquehuanca 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Frodar (talk) 05:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
File:Canciller Andrés Allamand participa del saludo protocolar al Presidente de Bolivia, Luis Arce, y al Vicepresidente, David Choquehuanca 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Frodar (talk) 05:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kuatrero:
I'm sorry to bother you!
Hello, I'm BureibuNeko. I send the message to invite you to participate in a discussion about whether I can obtain LR permissions. I think the current vote is unfair, at least relatively. Therefore, if you can participate in this discussion, I will be grateful. ( Whether you support or oppose )
Sorry to bother you again !
In addition, I invite you because you have expressed your opinions on LR permission request page, so this is not canvassing! And thank you again!
Regards,
What color are you, Sibyl System? 11:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changesorRecent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(中国大陆) ∙ 中文(台灣) ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ +/−
Hi Bedivere, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
rubin16 (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
File:Abraham Quintanilla.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Ixfd64 (talk) 02:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
File:AB Quintanilla.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Ixfd64 (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I noticed that you've been nominating various images with a {{Cc-Gobierno de Chile}} tag for speedy deletion. Note that speedy deletion is only for obvious cases, where a patrolling admin can immediately understand why the image is not freely licensed as stated. Please use the regular COM:DR process in the future for these kinds of images. If there are restrictions on the applicability of the tag, then you can propose changes to the wording of the template so that everyone can easily see which images are ineligible for the tag. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, note that "unlikely own work" is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. I've converted some of your tags to regular DRs: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pedro María Ramírez.png. COM:CSD#F1 says: "Content is a clear copyright violation, with evidence that no Commons-compatible licensing has been issued by the copyright holder." The speedy deletion tagger must provide evidence of their position, which usually comes in the form of a link to another copy on the web which is older and at least as large as the version on Commons, and which does not have a free license indicated at the external site. Without this evidence we are just guessing, which is an acceptable reason for regular deletion, but not speedy deletion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(...) I implore you to delete an image, or two, but I see that you are a (...) for copyrghts. (...) I wish you the worst, (...) Monteaguilino1 (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, Bedivere. Por favor, no te dirijas a otros usuarios llamándolos por su nombre "IRL" sin venir a cuento (viene con un poco de retardo esta petición, pero seguramente seas capaz de recordar cuándo lo hiciste). Estoy seguro de que eres un usuario que sabe lo molesto que puede ser esto, lo que hace que esta situación me llame aún más la atención. Gracias por adelantado. Sin otro particular, Strakhov (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please pingortalk to me🇺🇦 21:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Buenas noches, Bedivere. Yo había mencionado que Valparaíso fue nombrada así por "Valparaíso de Arriba". Omití mencionar por qué la llamaron así. Se puede leer en esta referencia oficial: Gobierno Regional de Valparaíso. Saludos, Fadesga (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ +/− |
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Academialogo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permissiontoVRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). |
Taichi (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you tagged File:Gino Meschiari.jpg for speedy deletion with the rationale "not released under that license". In general, COM:CSD#F1 requires proof of copyvio and reasonable confidence that the image cannot possibly be public domain, so for these older photos it is better to use regular COM:DR. However, in this case it qualifies for {{PD-Italy}}, since the subject died in 1947 (and so any photo of them must have been taken before then). See Commons:Copyright rules/Photographs for more info on which countries have a special short copyright term for photos, including but not limited to Italy, Spain, Poland, Argentina, and Peru. Also be careful about US works (of any type, not just photos) prior to 1989, because they may be public domain as well (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Copyright formalities). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, en mi página de discusión, respondí tu requerimiento sobre mi foto. Ojalá puedas leerlo a la brevedad. Espero tu respuesta. Abrazo. Juampayo Escorpio (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
La plantilla que colocas en mis fotos dice que『si no es considerado para borrado rápido, se retire la plantilla』y que te deje un mensaje. Bueno, las fotos de Ana Torin fueron tomadas con mi celular, nunca he tenido un iPhone como equipo personal, sin embargo, he tomado fotos con otros dispositivos. Sin embargo, aunque tomé las fotos, y obviamente fui el fotógrafo, si no puedo demostrar que el equipo es mío, entiendo que hagan un borrado, está bien, pero, ¿las de Ana fueron tomadas con un iPhone? Y la del grupo 123 Andrés, lamento no haberla tomado con mi celular, sino con la cámara de otra persona, creí que yo tenía que ser el fotógrafo, no el dueño del equipo. Te agradecería revises bien esas plantillas, pues, las justificaciones para borrar están erróneas en el caso de Ana. Gracias. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bedivere, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.
Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!
Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchatonirc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Killarnee (talk) 02:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
HI, Are you opposing or supporting? Yann (talk) 20:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Buenas. Since you know more about copyright in Chile than I do, I would like to ask you something. You see, there is an image of the prominent Chilean lawyer and jurist René Ramos Pazos, which I would like to add to Commons. The problem is that I don't know if it can be shared through a free license, since it is an engraving, which is on a commemorative plaque, at the entrance to the Universidad de Concepción School of Law Library. I would really appreciate it if you could answer that question for me.
I am attaching the images, which are uploaded externally to the cloud.
Mi más cordial saludo Monteaguilino1 (talk) 17:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm somewhat unfamiliar with what the ToO is like in Chile but COM:Chile hints at it being low? Wanted to check with someone who'd probably know more about Chilean law than I do Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I saw you nominated some files I uploaded to the wiki. Please, do the same (where it should be done obviously) with most of the coats at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Comunas_de_Chile as their are almost done the same way based on the original one from the city. In some cases, they are supposedluy based on other works, but if you check them... I cannot see relevant resemblance (for instance Escudo de Arica.svg with Coat of arms of Bolivia.svg (they only took the mountain), nor say where they based the artworks as to be an "official" coat of arms. Thanks for making the site more righteous. ravmn (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC-4)
Hello Bedivere, thank you for your comment on my RfA. I added some more information in the comments section, does this help you? If not, is there anything else I should add? Thank you again, Gnom (talk) 13:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, please explain why you closed the discussion about my license reviewer request? Only one user voted there. And I even didn't have time to answer. If it's a discussion there must be an explained discussion based on opinion of several voters. FlorianH76 (talk) 05:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please take care when closing Com:LRR requests, it says ”excluding the section heading with {{Frh}} and {{Frf}}“. Thanks. Killarnee (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bedivere, thank you for going through suspicious uploads like those of Carigval.97 and nominating them for deletion. But please reserve {{Copyvio}} for those cases where you have a weblink or other reference where the respective images have been taken from. This template is reserved for obvious cases where no further research is required. In other cases, like this one, it is better to use the batch task tool to mass nominate all similarly suspicious uploads of one user in one deletion request. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 09:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−
¡Felicidades Bedivere! Ya tienes derechos de administrador en Wikimedia Commons. Por favor toma unos minutos para leer Commons:Administradores y añadir a tu lista de vigilancia las páginas relacionadas (en particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboardyCommons:Deletion requests), antes de lanzarte a borrar y proteger páginas, bloquear cuentas y modificar páginas protegidas, dado que Commons tiene sus propias reglas que pueden diferir de las de otras wikis.
La mayoría de las acciones de un administrador pueden ser deshechas por los demás, salvo la fusión de historiales, por lo que esto último debe realizarse con sumo cuidado.
Recuerda también que Commons es un proyecto multilingüe, puedes usar español si lo deseas. Ten la libertad de entrar a nuestro canal de IRC: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any user should be free to mass-remove stuff from their talk-pages. I wonder what made you click rollback here? ─ Aafī (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was very little discussion and no one was listening to my point of view. Besides, it already had an in-scope use here before it was wrongfully deleted. Everyone who supported deletion was being dismissive TheKumquatGuy2662 (talk) 16:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Why is "FOP" not a valid deletion reason? --Krd 05:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You added a notice at the discussion on ANU "Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. ". Where should this be made? Enhancing999 (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas,esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept) y una cosa por favor cierra el DR. AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
File:Poster of the movie The Barn Dance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Abzeronow (talk) 19:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When I thought the copyright holder allows anybody to use it. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 02:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you for understand and approving my unblock request. Have a good day :) Antny08 (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Bedivere, estaba viendo que Marrovi mantiene un amplio rango IP manejando a sus anchas, si revisas las contribuciones incluyen ediciones a su categoría de fotografías, lo que implica que poco o nada está afectando el bloqueo. En la Wikipedia en español sí mantiene el bloqueo en el rango. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I have some concern about Special:Contributions/Jorge_Arboleda and what seems to be a personal photo collection here. Jmabel mirrored some of my concerns (conversation User talk:Jmabel#2nd_opinion). Wondered whether you could have a look and have a conversation to point them in the right direction. Thanks if you can, otherwise I will try an English language conversation. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Bedivere, unfortunately I was unable to contribute to the discussion that took place about me due to other activities in real life. We are all volunteers here who want to support this project in our valuable free time :-) I would have liked to have written a few lines to justify myself on this. On a positive note, I have noticed your balanced and neutral assessment of this matter, for which you deserve my appreciation. Best regards, Msb (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Buenos días, te escribo porque me di cuenta de que borraste un archivo que subí, y a continuación varios otros más. El primero de ellos, una imagen del escudo de Palmilla, se encontraba con la licencia correcta, pues solicité a través de las plataformas de transparencia del gobierno de Chile, y en concreto de la Municipalidad de Palmilla, cuál era la licencia que utilizaba la página web de esta última. La respuesta que me llegó el día de hoy me señala que se trata de una "licencia de software libre estándar W3C Software Notice and Licence", que es la que señalé en el archivo que subí (Template:W3C Licence). Entiendo que usted desconocía esa información, pero por lo menos me pudo haber señalado mi error en mi página de discusión y así yo le hubiera aclarado la situación.
Respecto del resto de los archivos que borró, asumo que se trata de una situación similar (uso incorrecto de licencias). Nuevamente me hubiera gustado un aviso previo, sin embargo, comprendo que sólo aplicaba las normas sobre uso de licencias en Wikimedia. Intentaré conocer cuáles son las licencias que corresponde usar para dichas imágenes, solicitando dicha información por transparencia a los gobiernos regionales de Chile. Le recuerdo también que uno de esos archivos era un cropped de File:Ricardo Diaz foto.jpg, y no entiendo por qué borró mi recorte y no el original.
Sin más que añadir, lo mantendré al tanto sobre futuros avances respecto del copyright de dichos archivos. Saludos cordiales. SamuelInzunza (talk) 15:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bedivere, I believe commons and encyclopedia as a whole has strict rules against copyright violations and I do understand why the above mentioned file was speedied here. However, if you take a good look on the link the nominator claims the file was taken from, they do not match as on the deleted file the woman was wearing that cloth over her head and on the aforementioned link she's not. Therefore, I was requesting undeletion and requesting the nominator to be careful next time and also be aware of the dates before nominating for deletion Thank you. Dxneo (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere Buenas, una pregunta que pasaría si el CNE (poder electoral, Dominio Público) legaliza el logo de un partido político en Venezuela estará al Dominio Público ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}})?? Por que el CNE es el poder electoral que convierte Logos de partidos políticos en Venezuela en tarjetas electorales AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, necesito que modifiques (editar) agregar Venezuela en el Commons:Coats of arms#Copyright on the representation por que las banderas y escudos de Armas en Venezuela (Tanto Nacionales, como estatales y municipales) son de dominio público {{PD-VenezuelaGov}} por que son Invenciones como indica en el Deletion Request (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Caracas (2022).png). AbchyZa22 (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The given deletion reason here was "Logo." So you think we can't host any logos, or you just preferred not to type the real reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas ,esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept),el logo que contiene era solamente texto pero "CV" pegados?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Por favor, podrías encargarte de esto, el usuario continúa a replicar el contenido ignorando la resolución de borrado. Gracias de antemano Wilfredor (talk) 20:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, una pregunta los logos de planes de gobierno (planes creados por el gobernador, alcaldes o presidente) por ejemplo (File:Logo Lara Progresista (2012-2017).jpg) estará al Dominio Público ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}})?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
File:4 - The Barn Dance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Gerarge Plublic Alember (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (keep)?? (Notas:El Usuario Taivo votó por keep dijo:"Logos are very small and de minimis".) AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Buenas noches
Veo que está en la labor de borrar escudos y banderas ecuatorianas con la justificación de que están sujetas a copyright, ¿me podría alcanzar la codificación legal de dicha norma? no encuentro nada respecto a símbolos municipales.
También tengo otra duda, ¿esto significa que va a borrar TODAS las banderas y escudos de ciudades y cantones ecuatorianos, e incluso hasta los nacionales?
Gracias. Milenioscuro (talk) 08:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Buenas tardes
La cuestión es que no soy ecuatoriano, solo subí un escudo (el de la provincia de Chimborazo) solo porque este se encontraba disponible en un archivo anteriormente subido que era la bandera, desconozco completamente la legislación ecuatoriana respecto a lo que es de licencia libre o no. Mi situación es más particular: he realizado en formato svg numerosos escudos y banderas para ilustrar los artículos de Colombia y sus subdivisiones, la cuestión es que los gobiernos de esas entidades (incluido el nacional) han tomado dichos emblemas y los han puesto en sus propias páginas como si fueran creaciones suyas, poniéndole unos derechos de autor que no tienen ni deberían tener, pues fueron subidas a commons con licencia de compartir y dar atribución. Si se llegara el caso de revisar esas subidas, ahí si pondría yo rotunda objeción, pues tengo como probar que son archivos originales míos.
Saludos. --Milenioscuro (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Buenos días, veo que haz borrado cantidad de fotos y dibujos de mi autoría sin justificación alguna y de manera equivocada. Me imagino que el problema tal vez se originó a partir del borrado de banderas y escudos del Ecuador, pero por alguna razón también se borraron otras imágenes no relacionadas con esta discusión incluyendo gran cantidad de dibujos cuyos originales todavía conservo. En mi página de discusión está la lista de todo lo que se borró injustificadamente.
Atentamente SimonLuzuriaga (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Bedivere, me encuentro preocupado por lo que parece ser algunos borrados injustificados que has realizado, como menciona el usuario SimonLuzuriaga arriba. Soy parte del grupo de usuarios Wikimedistas de Ecuador y es claro que hay un problema cuando uno de nuestros integrantes que es un usuario que estudia un postdoctorado de arqueología y que ha subido a lo largo de los años dibujos realizados por él mismo de la historia arqueológica y la cultura de civilizaciones ecuatorianas precolombinas para ilustrar artículos en Wikipedia, así como fotos tomadas por él mismo de estos objetos históricos, nos comenta que han sido borradas sus aportaciones de forma extensa desde ayer (no en referencia a los escudos, sino a los dibujos y fotos de las culturas precolombinas). Me preocupa en sobremanera esto porque en los borrados masivos podrian haber otros casos como el suyo con usuarios que tal vez no se han enterado aún, dado que la mayoría de estos archivos no tuvo el anuncio correspondiente a los usuarios antes del borrado. Tambien me llama la atención el pedido de metadata en fotos. No recuerdo que haya una regla en Commons sobre obligatoriedad de metadata en una foto para ser subida. Si es que la hay, podrias indicarme El link de donde esté? Mas tomando en cuenta que la metadata puede facilmente desaparecer al crear una versión Nueva de una foto en editores como Gimp, muy usados por la comunidad al ser open source. Saludos--Freddy eduardo (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hi Bedivere
I saw that you try to support public domain files, I have some currently deleted PD-ART-OLD-100 license files. they would be portraits & period photographs. I can underdoors if I can afford it?? Габорбамба (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, necesito que preguntes al Usuario Taivo porque eliminó el CC-BY-SA 3.0 para agregar el {{PD-VenezuelaGov}} en la foto (File:Bandera Municipio Rio Negro Estado Amazonas.jpg esta foto fue chequeada por el Usuario Taivo en el {{LicenseReview}}) según el sitio web de Fandom (https://banderas-locales-de-america-e-iberia.fandom.com/es/wiki/Banderas_Municipales_Y_Parroquiales_De_Venezuela) dice:El contenido de la comunidad está disponible bajo CC-BY-SA a menos que se indique lo contrario. (o que según el Usuario Echando una mano en el Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Caracas (2022).png dice:Las banderas y escudos de Armas en Venezuela son Invenciones.) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I know you may be busy, but I noticed that in some commons categories Category:Photographers and others not for users, have users in them. They should not be in those categories, is that correct? Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 20:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Este escudo de Ecuador podría tener los mismos problemas que los otros: File:Escudo de Pichincha 2013.png. Saludos--Freddy eduardo (talk) 18:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Uploads of the users called Kirsehirlitv and Usaklimtv uploaded new versions of their files and all of them are the same. This vandalistic situation caused a huge problem in both of Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Can you revert all of their recent new file uploads in their uploads or delete all of them? Aybeg (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, la foto de Marcos Perez Jimenez (https://articulo.mercadolibre.com.ve/MLV-753227417-venezuela-marcos-perez-jimenez-_JM) está en el Dominio Público {{PD-VenezuelaGov}} porque ese fue editado en 1957 por el Ministerio del Fomento es posible subir la foto a Wikimedia?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
File:Death certificate of Patricio Bañados.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Laegipcia (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, el logo (https://twitter.com/manuelrosalesg/status/956712085848772609) de la Mesa de la Unidad Democrática forman parte del too simple {{PD-textlogo}} (la manito casi es una imagen pero con líneas negras y los colores amarillo, azul y rojo forman parte del Dominio Público {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}) es posible publicar a Wikimedia?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 11:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, una pregunta que pasaría si el Usuario nominará el Logo de la Alcaldía en Venezuela ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}}) como Copyvio es posible que el Usuario nominado será bloqueado de Wikimedia por violación de las leyes en Venezuela?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 10:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, una pregunta que pasaría si la cuenta oficial de la Alcaldía publicará la sede de la Alcaldía (después si público a Wikimedia es posible agregar el {{PD-VenezuelaGov}})?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Bedivere, feliz día del trabajador ante todo. ¿Podrías retirar la amenaza innecesaria en mi PD y de ser posible aplicar una semiprotección indefinida a la discusión? Hay alguien con mucho tiempo para jugar al matón y yo no. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 17:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido o quedarse?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright status: File:Mickey Mouse drinking beer in The Gallopin' Gaucho (1928).jpg
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mickey Mouse drinking beer in The Gallopin' Gaucho (1928).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido o quedarse?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, una pregunta por que removiste el Logo del Partido UNE File:Logo Partido Unión Nacional Electoral (Venezuela).jpg si ese logo no contiene imágenes?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 15:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido o quedarse?? (por favor incluye cerrar el DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:LOGO SEAMAT.png) AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me? RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let alone [2] (targeted at any editor here) is the sort of action that raises very real concerns over the fitness of an admin. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ العربية ∙ +/−
RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop modifying my entry at ANU. I started the thread and I want it kept apart. Please stop modifying my entry. RAN (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Me disculpo por mí desición irresponsable en la nominación para revisor de licencias, ¿Puedes ayudarme a tener desiciones más responsables? Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 21:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bedivere (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]