NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Wireguard woes




To: Ramiro Aceves <ea1abz%gmail.com@localhost>

Subject: Re: Wireguard woes

From: Sad Clouds <cryintothebluesky%gmail.com@localhost>

Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:53:58 +0000


On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:25:42 +0100
Ramiro Aceves <ea1abz%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:

> And then it works again from the local network. This may be related to 
> the absence of the PersistentKeepalive = 20 parameter that comes in the 
> configuration file sent by email from the tunnel provider and that does 
> not exist in  NetBSD implementation of WireGuard.

If I'm not mistaken, persistent keepalive setting is sometimes needed
for NAT firewalls that keep state. You can try running ping in a while
loop every 10 seconds and see if this resolves connectivity issues.


Follow-Ups:

Re: Wireguard woes
From: Ramiro Aceves


References:

Wireguard woes
From: beaker

Re: Wireguard woes
From: Peter Miller

Re: Wireguard woes
From: Ramiro Aceves

Re: Wireguard woes
From: Sad Clouds

Re: Wireguard woes
From: Ramiro Aceves




Prev by Date: Re: Internet services and US vs EU jurisdiction

Next by Date: Re: Name resolution and underscores? www.engadget.com

Previous by Thread: Re: WireGuard + /32 tunnel endpoint: incoming connections unreachable on NetBSD was: Wireguard woes

Next by Thread: Re: Wireguard woes

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index