On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:07:40PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:46:21 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger > <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:43:56PM +0000, David Holland wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:30:27PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote: > >> > fonts/libfontenc 49 joerg%NetBSD.org@localhost > >> > >> This package has been in most of the bulk builds. Is it supposed to > >> work or is it a native vs. modular thing? If it's not supposed to be > >> used with native X, shouldn't it be marked accordingly? > > > > Because the native X on NetBSD doesn't provide .pc. Given that the same > > issue also occurs for certain modern Gnome/KDE components, I don't think > > this is a problem of libfontenc, but of x11-links. > > Just an interest, if native X NetBSD-4 (XFree86) provides *.pc file, > x11/libfontenc is usable with Xfree86? > > The other hand, x11/liboldXrandr is usable with modular X? If they provide the pkgconfig files and they are new enough, yes. liboldXrandr exists simply because I refuse to mess up libXrandr for the same reason. Joerg