-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Klaus Heinz wrote: >> For me, it would be useful. Though Pidgin and Finch can be considered >> separate. > > This indicates, IMO, that there should be two packges chat/pidgin > and chat/finch. Both would use the same source archive and probably > share a Makefile.common. I'm making three packages, like in FreeBSD ports: chat/libpurple, chat/pidgin and chat/finch. I'm not entirely sure how to work around some issues with the options framwork and multiple packages, but I'll figure it out. - -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFGW4NtuPlHKFfKXTYRCpwFAJ4mnvhG89pGedLNlp9cj/YEpt4OtgCfVclm ufn+MG25/ZAIUmkDMOTkJfg= =d2Lw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----