pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool




To: pkgsrc-users%NetBSD.org@localhost

Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and libtool

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>

Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:05:42 +0100


On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:59:00AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> That often works fine; the problem is that the patches to make
> PostgreSQL use libtool don't work right; PostgreSQL has its own fairly
> complicated shlib spport system and in this case that seems to work
> better than our force-libtool approach.  I don't think people are
> arguing that pkgsrc swapping in libtool is in general bad, but rather
> that in this particular case we're worse off.

Are we? How often did we have problems with the libtool build?
Compare the history of the Darwin rules in PostgreSQL itself. It was
broken a number of times, too. The most likely candidate for the current
OSX fallout is -bundle. The easiest way to fix this is figure out how
the plsql module is built in both cases (with and w/o libtool).

Joerg


Follow-Ups:

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Patrick Welche


References:

PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Adam

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Aleksej Saushev

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Patrick Welche

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Aleksej Saushev

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Thomas Klausner

Re: PostgreSQL and libtool
From: Greg Troxel




Prev by Date: Re: PostgreSQL and libtool

Next by Date: RE: Option to create statically linked binaries

Previous by Thread: Re: PostgreSQL and libtool

Next by Thread: Re: PostgreSQL and libtool

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index