Hello, Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes: > We have gramps3 in pkgsrc, so I don't have problems with removing these two. It would be really nice to have consistent style in pkgsrc for these cases. In particular, some packages follow the convention of "pkgname" is the latest version, "pkgnamesuffix" is some alternative version, other packages provide "pkgname" as version 1, "pkgname2" as version like in this case. I understand that for some software this may not work nice, and package always has a version, but could we agree on some generic convention? If we follow such convention the proposal like "lets' remove databases/gramps" wouldn't start questions since it would be clear that it is some alternative version to be removed. As for the main subject, I oppose removal of python25. It has only been a year, many people might not have converted. It would be better if we start announcing such changes a release ahead. In my opinion, we release frequently enough to do this. If you mean that having a package in pkgsrc means that we assume some sort of responsibility, I think we could safely announce that python25 is scheduled for removal and thus we are not going to care of it any longer. -- HE CE3OH...