pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?




To: pkgsrc-users%netbsd.org@localhost

Subject: Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?

From: Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost>

Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:11:07 +0400


Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> writes:

> Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:14:12PM +0200, Dario Niedermann wrote:
>>> When I run 'bmake update' all the dependencies of the package I'm
>>> updating are rebuilt, even if there aren't newer versions available.
>>> Is there a way to avoid this?
>>
>> You are thinking of "bmake replace". It's essentially doing what your
>> recipe is doing.
>
> Also, see sysutils/pkg_rolling-replace, which is a way to recover from
> the inconsistencies that make replace can cause.

I had experience of exactly the opposite in past.


-- 
HE CE3OH...



Follow-Ups:

Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?
From: Greg Troxel


References:

Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?
From: Dario Niedermann

Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?
From: Greg Troxel




Prev by Date: Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?

Next by Date: Re: core dump sysutils/sysupgrade

Previous by Thread: Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?

Next by Thread: Re: Why are depends rebuilt on "bmake update"?

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index