pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?




To: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>

Subject: Re: fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?

From: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>

Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:02:20 -0500


Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:46:36AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
>> Isn't there supposed to be a correlation between package version and the
>> library version - i.e. shouldn't package version 2.x imply .so.2?
>
> No, you cannot expect that in general.

And further, packages that try to make that work are doing the wrong
thing, and cause extra trouble, becuase there are needless shlib
version bumps (not due to an ABI break).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Follow-Ups:

texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]
From: Mayuresh


References:

fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?
From: Mayuresh

Re: fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?
From: Thomas Klausner




Prev by Date: Re: fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?

Next by Date: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

Previous by Thread: Re: fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?

Next by Thread: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index