On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:53:20PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > According to pkgsrc guide, it looks we should also bump PKGREVISIONs > because at least PLISTs and (some) dependencies are updated: > > https://www.netbsd.org/docs/pkgsrc/fixes.html#bumping-pkgrevision > >> PKGREVISION should be incremented for any non-trivial change > >> in the resulting binary package. > : > >> Examples of changes that do not merit increasing PKGREVISION are: > >> - Changing HOMEPAGE, MAINTAINER, OWNER, or comments in Makefile. > >> - Changing build variables if the resulting binary package is the same. > >> - Changing DESCR. > >> - Adding PKG_OPTIONS if the default options don't change. > >> Examples of changes that do merit an increase to PKGREVISION include: > >> - Security fixes > >> - Changes or additions to a patch file > >> - Changes to the PLIST > >> - A dependency is changed or renamed. > --- > > How should we handle the "merit" in this case? Yes, PKGREVISION bump is necessary because the PLIST has changed. Thomas