On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:16:41PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote: > > Also, the builtin kerberos (krb5) seems to be insuffient for both loudmouth > > and "net/wireshark" (2.2.0). > > I can answer this part -- NetBSD comes with heimdal kerberos, but > wireshark does not currently support this, so I made it pull in > mit-krb5. > > The Makefile even mentions the upstream bug report about this: > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12831 Yes, I saw that and figured it must be the case. As to "loudmouth" and kerberos, I saw this: http://mail-index.NetBSD.org/pkgsrc-changes/2016/09/21/msg147047.html but perhaps builtin (heimdal) kerberos is sufficient? There is no actual dependency on a kerberos installation, either through "DEPENDS+=" or including any krb5-related "bl3.mk" file. Or is this a case of overzealous './configure' boilerplate? As to the SSL/TLS issue, for my use case, since I am already installing "gnutls" for other things, might as well set it for "loudmouth" too. -- |/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS NetBSD Darwin/MacOS X |\ / jdbaker[snail]mylinuxisp[flyspeck]com OpenBSD FreeBSD | X No HTML/proprietary data in email. BSD just sits there and works! |/ \ GPGkeyID: D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4 BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645