Port-amd64 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?




To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>

Subject: Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?

From: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>

Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:39:53 -0500


I am confused about the rbus area.  On some machines (Thinkpad 600E),
rbus_min_start has to be 512 MB, and this seems to have something to do
with the processor not addressing > 1GB.

I have been under the impression that the PCI memory space was in
physical addresses, and that rbus_min_start was in virtual.  But I have
never really been clear on this.

  When I tried a compact flash disk, I was told "card appears to have
  bogus CIS".  It behaves just fine on an i386.

I think this is different from "bad rbus_min_start".  On my T60, cardbus
cards work fine with rbus_min_start auto-sized to 2 GB (2 GB ram in it),
even one of those pesky EVDO cards, vz and sprint.  But pcmcia cards
lose with a similar message to yours.




Follow-Ups:

Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?
From: Steven M. Bellovin


References:

Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?
From: Steven M. Bellovin

Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?
From: Jared D. McNeill

Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?
From: Steven M. Bellovin




Prev by Date: Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?

Next by Date: Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?

Previous by Thread: Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?

Next by Thread: Re: constraints on rbus_min_start?

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index