On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 19:07:24 +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 14:32:27 +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 04:26:30PM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > > > sligtly different set of atomic primitives is provided by the compat > > > libc (this might or might not be a bug, I couldn't get an answer from > > > people in the know). > > > > I think this is because on sparc64 we know the hardware is at least sun4u, > > so we can assume all sparcv9 instructions are available, while the regular > > sparc libs are build for sparcv7 (with optional overlays for sparcv8). > > I know. I don't remember the exact failure scenario - bringing over > to sparc64 machine a real sparc binary that needs certain symbols that > compat libc doesn't provide, or something like that. https://gnats.netbsd.org/58975 -uwe