Port-i386 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: MATH_EMULATE




To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry%piermont.com@localhost>

Subject: Re: MATH_EMULATE

From: Vit Herman <v.herman%sh.cvut.cz@localhost>

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:03:22 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Perry E. Metzger wrote:


It wouldn't need to be a port. It would just need to be a slightly
different set of compile options.


Agreed.


The real problem is how to make sure that it doesn't rot...


How much could it possibly rot? 
I mean, how much could such compile  options get incompatibile with possible source changes - and what is the  chance that it doesn't run even though it does build (and works when built  the normal way)?

BTW I finally got to my 
486SX machine yesterday and wanted to try NetBSD  4.0 with no luck (the machine restarts right after loading the kernel).  3.1 works flawlessly (except for the float stuff).

Vit Herman





Follow-Ups:

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: der Mouse

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Perry E. Metzger


References:

MATH_EMULATE
From: Andrew Doran

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Perry E. Metzger

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Jared D. McNeill

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Perry E. Metzger

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Jared D. McNeill

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Perry E. Metzger

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Pierre Dubuc

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Vit Herman

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Matthias Drochner

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Perry E. Metzger

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: der Mouse

Re: MATH_EMULATE
From: Perry E. Metzger




Prev by Date: Re: cpuid instruction causes panic on 486DX system

Next by Date: Re: MATH_EMULATE

Previous by Thread: Re: MATH_EMULATE

Next by Thread: Re: MATH_EMULATE

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index