Port-i386 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY




To: Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>

Subject: Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY

From: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner%fz-juelich.de@localhost>

Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:15:34 +0100


ad%NetBSD.org@localhost said:
> It's unlikely to be related for the reason given above, and because
> the snapshot of activity you get from CPUs other than the CPU that
> originally panic'ed is from some time after the panic happened.

Yes I know, but I was hoping that there is at least some correlation.

> Hmm, it would be
> worthwhile to add another KASSERT() in softint_execute()

I've just tried with kern_softint.c rev. 1.13, but my
breakpoint at "not lowered on syscall exit" did fire
before.

best regards
Matthias




-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir'in Baerbel Brumme-Bothe
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. Harald Bolt,
Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------


Follow-Ups:

Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY
From: Andrew Doran


References:

Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY
From: Andrew Doran

Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY
From: Andrew Doran




Prev by Date: Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY

Next by Date: Re: Please help - configuring e-mail

Previous by Thread: Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY

Next by Thread: Re: SPL NOT ZERO ON SYSCALL ENTRY

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index