On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:55:55PM -0800, Greg A. Woods wrote: > Either that or maybe the support for the unique chips it alone can > handle should be migrated to rtk(4) and re(4) should be sent to the bit > bucket. (That's said with my only, at least even semi-recent, > experience with the both of them being now with XenClient.) re(4) uses a completely different DMA path, which is wastly superior to rtk(4), so that wouldn't be an improvement. Joerg