Port-i386 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority




To: jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost

Subject: Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority

From: Erik Fair <fair%netbsd.org@localhost>

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:07:26 -0700


On Aug 13, 2012, at 08:49, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:14:50PM -0700, Erik Fair wrote:
>> NetBSD has a problem with NTP time keeping on x86 systems which have TSC:
>> if those systems have variable CPU clock frequency support for power
>> consumption efficiency (e.g.  SpeedStep, PowerNow), if or when the CPU
>> frequency changes, the relationship between TSC and the ticking of real
>> time changes.  That screws up any kind of interval time & frequency
>> measurement one is using TSC for.
> 
> I think this is no longer true with new AMD and Intel processors.

Can you find a reference in either Intel or AMD's documentation, and to which 
CPUs that applies (preferably with some indicator we can test at system 
initialization time)?

        thanks,

        Erik <fair%clock.org@localhost>



Follow-Ups:

Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority
From: Jukka Ruohonen


References:

TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority
From: Erik Fair

Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority
From: Jukka Ruohonen




Prev by Date: Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority

Next by Date: Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority

Previous by Thread: Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority

Next by Thread: Re: TSC vs. HPET timecounter priority

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index