Port-i386 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch




To: Jonathan A. Kollasch <jakllsch%kollasch.net@localhost>

Subject: Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch

From: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>

Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:08:56 -0800


On Dec 5, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:

> 
> And now for something without C bitfields.
> <pcitag-diff-2.txt>


Better.

FN -> FUNC
DEVFN -> DEVFUNC

_tag should have a cast of (pcitag_t) in it otherwise its type will be 
uintmax_t not uint32_t.



Follow-Ups:

Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch
From: Jonathan A. Kollasch


References:

x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch
From: Jonathan A. Kollasch

Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch
From: Jonathan A. Kollasch




Prev by Date: Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch

Next by Date: Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch

Previous by Thread: Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch

Next by Thread: Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index