Port-i386 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint




To: Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>

Subject: Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint

From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>

Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:22:26 +0200


On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 04:14:46PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> (b) update the primary bootloader with installboot and move /boot to
> /biosboot if they want to turn the existing image into a hybrid image
> that can also be booted with EFI (assuming it's already on a GPT).

Minor nit: GPT is unrelated here, but the disk needs to have space
for a new EFI System Partition (or already have one). You can UEFI-boot
MBR partitioned disks just fine.

I guess the main point of confusion is that you can't add /boot as a directory
to the mtree specials file or similar (or find/add some mtree notation that
allows it to be a file instead), and that you are not going to create
a directory /boot on updates (but would do so on new installs, via
sysinst at runtime, and not include the dir in any sets).

Martin


References:

Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint
From: Robert Elz

Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint
From: Taylor R Campbell




Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint

Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint

Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint

Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] BIOS boot vs EFI system partition mountpoint

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index