Re: ntpd wedged by libc?

●To: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> ●Subject: Re: ntpd wedged by libc? ●From: AGC <agcarver+netbsd%acarver.net@localhost> ●Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:03:29 -0800

On 3/4/2012 17:27, Christos Zoulas wrote:

Add:
tf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "timeout", "3000");

to the setup of that test. I guess it did not finish on time.


I had to bump it up to 30,000 but it finally did finish:

# ./t_printf
Content-Type: application/X-atf-tcs; version="1"

tcs-count: 6
tc-start: snprintf_dotzero
__atf_tc_separator__
__atf_tc_separator__
tc-end: snprintf_dotzero, passed
tc-start: snprintf_posarg
__atf_tc_separator__
__atf_tc_separator__
tc-end: snprintf_posarg, passed
tc-start: snprintf_posarg_width
__atf_tc_separator__
__atf_tc_separator__
tc-end: snprintf_posarg_width, passed
tc-start: snprintf_posarg_error
__atf_tc_separator__
__atf_tc_separator__

tc-end: snprintf_posarg_error, failed, Test case did not exit cleanly; state was 138

tc-start: snprintf_float
__atf_tc_separator__
__atf_tc_separator__
tc-end: snprintf_float, passed
tc-start: sprintf_zeropad

tc-end: sprintf_zeropad, failed, Line 157: strcmp((str),(" nan")) == 0 not met

●Follow-Ups: ●Re: ntpd wedged by libc? ●From: Christos Zoulas ●References: ●Re: ntpd wedged by libc? ●From: Christos Zoulas

●Prev by Date: Re: ntpd wedged by libc? ●Next by Date: Re: ntpd wedged by libc? ●Previous by Thread: Re: ntpd wedged by libc? ●Next by Thread: Re: ntpd wedged by libc? ●Indexes: ● reverse Date ● reverse Thread ● Old Index Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index