Port-sparc archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6




To: port-sparc%NetBSD.org@localhost

Subject: Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6

From: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>

Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:19:26 -0400 (EDT)


> Depends if anyone can come up with a reason to keep the default to
> WSEMUL_SUN on sparc.  I can't, all my kernels use VT100, but that
> doesn't mean nobody can.

How much does NetBSD care about compatability with historical practice
and/or with other OSes on the same hardware?

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B


Follow-Ups:

Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6
From: Martin Husemann


References:

Re: 6.0_BETA observations
From: John Nemeth

sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6
From: John D. Baker

Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6
From: Michael

Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6
From: John D. Baker

Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6
From: Martin Husemann

Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6
From: Michael




Prev by Date: Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6

Next by Date: Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6

Previous by Thread: Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6

Next by Thread: Re: sparc wscons behavior in -current and netbsd-6

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index