Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel




To: source-changes-d%NetBSD.org@localhost

Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

From: Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost>

Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:06:21 +0300


On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:53:21PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> One thing is reorganizing the tests to match the tree structure, but the
> other is to move the tests right next to the source

I don't quite understand the latter part. Why is this a bad thing?

I always thought that having a single unified "tests"-directory was a
benefit, not a disadvantage. Moving the tests "right next to the source"
does not really solve any of the questions; for instance, where would
system calls go? libc? sys/kern?

> (like we did with manpages).

This really never happened at full extent. Nor would it be desirable, and
largely for the same reasons.

- Jukka.


Follow-Ups:

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel
From: Julio Merino


References:

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel
From: Julio Merino




Prev by Date: Re: CVS commit: src

Next by Date: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

Previous by Thread: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

Next by Thread: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index