Source-Changes archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src




To: Simon Burge <simonb%NetBSD.org@localhost>

Subject: Re: CVS commit: src

From: Daniel Carosone <dan%geek.com.au@localhost>

Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:04:59 +1000


On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:02:34AM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> Elad Efrat wrote:
> 
> > also, where is the consensus of the class of programs to protect with
> > USE_FORT taken from? and what's the reason for it?
> 
> While talking about this change, it is too late to change the option
> name to "USE_FORTIFY"?  I can't see any reason for using the abbreviated
> "FORT" in the name.

seconded.

--
Dan.

Attachment: pgpp3sem0l5D0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


References:

Re: CVS commit: src
From: Elad Efrat

Re: CVS commit: src
From: Simon Burge




Prev by Date: Re: CVS commit: src

Next by Date: CVS commit: src/sys/kern

Previous by Thread: Re: CVS commit: src

Next by Thread: Re: CVS commit: src

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index