tech-misc archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: where are fsck return values documented?




To: Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost>

Subject: Re: where are fsck return values documented?

From: Luke Mewburn <lukem%NetBSD.org@localhost>

Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:13:42 +1100


On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 08:43:33PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
  | In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.0802231040260.19597%tx.reedmedia.net@localhost>,
  | Jeremy C. Reed <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost> wrote:
  | >And where does 130 come from?
  | >
  | 
  | 128 + 2 [SIGNALLED + SIGINT], should not really be there, but fsck_msdos
  | does not catch signals :-( Someone should fix it :-)

Is it worth converting fsck(8) and fsck_*(8) to correctly
re-raise the default handler for SIGINT, as per
        http://www.cons.org/cracauer/sigint.html
?

I'm not sure how to detect that an application exited
with a signal from sh(1).


(I've converted various tools in the tree to using
raise_default_signal(3) (in libutil) so that they have
the signal behaviour as described in the URL above.)

Attachment: pgp0YB5cNEg4k.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Follow-Ups:

Re: where are fsck return values documented?
From: Christos Zoulas


References:

where are fsck return values documented?
From: Jeremy C. Reed

Re: where are fsck return values documented?
From: Christos Zoulas




Prev by Date: Re: why not have rcvars for all rc.d scripts? -- and downinterfaces and bootconf.sh not complete rc.d scripts

Next by Date: Re: where are fsck return values documented?

Previous by Thread: Re: where are fsck return values documented?

Next by Thread: Re: where are fsck return values documented?

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index