tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: missing Apache licence




To: tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost

Subject: Re: missing Apache licence

From: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>

Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:15:57 -0500


Klaus Heinz <k.heinz%janacht.kh-22.de@localhost> writes:

> I added apache-2.0.

Thanks

> What about the other licences listed in mk/license.mk as acceptable by
> default but not yet available in mk/licenses/:
>   public-domain
>   original-bsd
>   modified-bsd
>   x11
>   cddl-1.0

I think I put them in the list but didn't add them.  If you're adding
some or all, sounds great.

> I thought I could simply download cddl-1.0 but it is surprisingly difficult
> to find a definite version as a simple text file. Maybe
>
>   http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing/cddllicense.txt
>
> (filtered through tr '\223\224' '""' and without the last 13 lines)
> or
>
>   http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.txt
>
> (with all HTML tags removed) could be used.

I'd go with the OSI version.  I suppose then for each package that uses
it it would be nitpickingly correct to diff the included version against
our text - it's too bad that there isn't a single canonical text, but oh
well.



References:

missing Apache licence
From: Klaus Heinz

Re: missing Apache licence
From: Greg Troxel

Re: missing Apache licence
From: Klaus Heinz




Prev by Date: Re: how to restart pbulk ?

Next by Date: Re: ultimate goal of DESTDIR support?

Previous by Thread: Re: missing Apache licence

Next by Thread: new option "buildxs" for Perl modules

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index