tech-repository archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

requirements document




To: tech-repository%netbsd.org@localhost

Subject: requirements document

From: Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney%gmail.com@localhost>

Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 10:23:04 -0500


Here's a suggested starting point

-> identify required CVS functionality; replacement must show
equivalent functionality
- commit
- branch
- tag
- merge
- vendor branch (I'm really skeptical towards that one)
- ?

-> identify new functionality, not present in CVS
- atomic commits

A look around:

- subversion lacks atomic commits (or order guarantee), branches and
tags (not first class)
- git, and presumably, mercurial, cover the remainder

--

Le mieux est le mortel ennemi du bien




Prev by Date: Re: does CVS officially support renames?

Next by Date: Re: does CVS officially support renames?

Previous by Thread: does CVS officially support renames?

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index