tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t




To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost

Subject: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t

From: Anthony Mallet <anthony.mallet%useless-ficus.net@localhost>

Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:30:12 +0100


Hi all,

I noticed that the recently added sys/pset.h defines a cpuset_t type, and
the int   pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_t, size_t, cpuset_t *);
function.

On a Linux 2.6, I can find the cpu_set_t type, and
int pthreadr_setaffinity_np(pthread_t, size_t, cpu_set_t *);

What is the correct type name? (from a POSIX p.o.v. I mean).



Follow-Ups:

Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
From: Mindaugas R.

Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
From: Joerg Sonnenberger


References:

rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
From: Anthony Mallet

Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
From: David Holland

Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
From: Anthony Mallet

Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
From: David Holland

Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
From: David Holland

Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
From: Anthony Mallet

Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
From: Hubert Feyrer




Prev by Date: Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P

Next by Date: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t

Previous by Thread: Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"

Next by Thread: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index