●Stories
●Firehose
●All
●Popular
●Polls
●Software
●Thought Leadership
Submit
●
Login
●or
●
Sign up
●Topics:
●Devices
●Build
●Entertainment
●Technology
●Open Source
●Science
●YRO
●Follow us:
●RSS
●Facebook
●LinkedIn
●Twitter
●
Youtube
●
Mastodon
●Bluesky
Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive
Forgot your password?
Close
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Load All Comments
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
/Sea
Score:
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
More
Login
Forgot your password?
Close
Close
Log In/Create an Account
●
All
●
Insightful
●
Informative
●
Interesting
●
Funny
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
by50000BTU_barbecue ( 588132 ) writes:
"Musk has been outspoken about his concerns around AI. During the keynote on Thursday, he called the technology his biggest fear."
Anyone still worshipping this cock bagel needs his head examined.
bydrinkypoo ( 153816 ) writes:
Anyone still worshipping this cock bagel needs his head examined.
Fans of the Musk will just move the goalposts. "Only Elon can save us from the AI, he has to have his own good AI to fight the bad AI" or whatever.
bysinij ( 911942 ) writes:
If you actually listen to what Musk said, and I know you don't and wouldn't, he is clear in his view of AI - it is danger to humanity, we shouldn't do it, there is no stopping doing it now, solving alignment problem is the only way humanity makes it, ideologically captured entities like Google and OpenAI actively teaching AI to lie to have it produce desired outputs is dangerous, producing benevolent AI could only be achieved by commitment to factual and non-slanted training/approach and this is why Musk is
bysmooth wombat ( 796938 ) writes:
ideologically captured entities like Google and OpenAI actively teaching AI to lie to have it produce desired outputs is dangerous
You mean like he's trying to do with Grok [yahoo.com]? The one which recently said he, Leon, was one of the greatest purveyors of misinformation on Twitter [fortune.com]?
You don't have to agree with Musk views on this, but his view is consistent and coherent.
Bullshit. He is repeatedly inconsistent in his views whether his claim of "free speech" (which he routinely violtates by banning peopl
bysinij ( 911942 ) writes:
Apply a modicum of critical thinking. If Musk was in US illegally, there would be a huge political win for Democrats to deport him and they would have done that a long time ago. More so, if Musk was in US illegally, how do you think he passed vetting that he had to go through for SpaceX get military contracts?
byArchieBunker ( 132337 ) writes:
Apply a modicum of critical thinking. If Musk was in US illegally, there would be a huge political win for Democrats to deport him and they would have done that a long time ago. More so, if Musk was in US illegally, how do you think he passed vetting that he had to go through for SpaceX get military contracts?
He was in the US illegally for a period of time. https://www.theguardian.com/te... [theguardian.com]
Having endless wealth and lawyers will smooth anything over.
bysinij ( 911942 ) writes:
Having endless wealth and lawyers will smooth anything over.
Not in a political situation. If some DA could make a career by prosecuting Musk, they absolutely would. Musk might still win, but the case would have played out in media, causing him reputational damage, as intended.
byLy4 ( 2353328 ) writes:
It's a federal crime, so there's nothing a DA could do.
The US government could go after Musk, of course, and revoke his citizenship. But denaturalization is a severe penalty for what might be a simple misunderstanding or filing error. So historically, that has only been used in severe cases, like war criminals and people who lied about things like murder convictions.
In the first Trump administration, Stephen Miller set up an entire effort to find people to denaturalize and report. SCOTUS cut that down a bit, but they are planning an even bigger effort this time around. The real goal, of course, is to make naturalized Americans into second-class citizens.
When the Justice Department goes after someone for filling a form incorrectly, but ignores Musk's overstay, there will be no shortage of sycophants willing to 'explain' how the cases are different. Don't be one of them.
More reading:
https://thehill.com/opinion/im... [thehill.com]
Parent
twitter
facebook
●nt threshold.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Slashdot
●
●
Submit Story
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
-- Roy Santoro
●FAQ
●Story Archive
●Hall of Fame
●Advertising
●Terms
●Privacy Statement
●About
●Feedback
●Mobile View
●Blog
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...
Working...