3 captures
12 Oct 2007 - 13 Jan 2024
Aug SEP Oct
14
2014 2015 2016
success
fail

About this capture

COLLECTED BY

Organization: Internet Archive

The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls. At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer. View the web archive through the Wayback Machine.

Collection: Wide Crawl Number 13

Web Wide Crawl Number 13
TIMESTAMPS

The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20150914220008/http://lwn.net/Articles/243501/
 
LWN.net Logo

Log in now

Create an account

Subscribe to LWN

The LPC Android microconference, part 2

LWN.net Weekly Edition for September 11, 2015

Easier Python string formatting

The LPC Android microconference, part 1

LWN.net Weekly Edition for September 3, 2015

RDSL and ignoring feedback

RDSL and ignoring feedback

Posted Jul 28, 2007 12:08 UTC (Sat) by jospoortvliet (subscriber, #33164)
In reply to: RDSL and ignoring feedback by corbet
Parent article: Still waiting for swap prefetch

I find that hard to believe if we're talking about the same person
complaining. His problem can never be fixed by CFS, unless CFS
automatically would renice his X, or would introduce unfairness some
other way.

CFS will cause regressions, because it doesn't do unfair scheduling -
which is what users have come to expect. There is no way around it.

Besides, CFS does worse on 3D gaming compared to SD and mainline, and ppl
will complain about that as well.

Note that I'm happy CFS got in mainline, as far as I can tell, it has a
superior design. It's just that the mentioned reasoning for the choice
doesn't work for me...

Maybe this is worth reading, if you didn't already.
http://osnews.com/story.php/18350/Linus-On-CFS-vs.-SD
(don't forget the OTHER SIDE of the story ;-) )


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2015, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds