Many models have identical implementations of prune_heads it would be nice to store that implementation as a method on PretrainedModel and reduce the redundancy.

Hi, is there any plan to provide a tutorial of showing an example of employing the Transformer as an alternative of RNN for seq2seq task such as machine translation?

For some reason, when I open the web document, real_a and fake_b are matching, but the real_b is from another image; however in the images folder the images are correct. Does someone know why does this happen?

Example scripts contains some dependencies not listed for Horovod, and in some cases require datasets without explaining how to obtain them. We should provide a README file along with a set of packages (requirements.txt) for successfully running the examples.

I tried selecting hyper parameters of my model following "Tutorial 8: Model Tuning" below:
https://github.com/flairNLP/flair/blob/master/resources/docs/TUTORIAL_8_MODEL_OPTIMIZATION.md

Although I got the "param_selection.txt" file in the result directory, I am not sure how to interpret the file, i.e. which parameter combination to use. At the bottom of the "param_selection.txt" file, I found "

It would be nice to separately log model computed loss from regularization loss in tensorboard. Involves minor changes to the Trainer.

Several parts of the op sec like the main op description, attributes, input and output descriptions become part of the binary that consumes ONNX e.g. onnxruntime causing an increase in its size due to strings that take no part in the execution of the model or its verification.

Setting __ONNX_NO_DOC_STRINGS doesn't really help here since (1) it's not used in the SetDoc(string) overload (s

❓ Questions and Help

I followed the fine-tuning example described in here: https://github.com/pytorch/fairseq/blob/master/examples/mbart/README.md
However I didn't manage to reproduce the results described in the paper for EN-RO translation.

How to reproduce fine tuning with mbart?

1. Can you clarify where did you get the data and how did you preprocess it for training in more de

The documentation about edge orientation is inconsistent. In the Creating Message Passing Networks tutorial, the main expression says that e𝑖,𝑗 denotes (optional) edge features from node 𝑖 to node 𝑗., the attached expression also suggests it. However, in documentation to MessagePassing.message(), the documentation says Constructs messages from node 𝑗 to node 𝑖 (this is actually true).

I

Excuse me, https://github.com/graykode/nlp-tutorial/blob/master/1-1.NNLM/NNLM-Torch.py#L50 The comment here may be wrong. It should be X = X.view(-1, n_step * m) # [batch_size, n_step * m]

Sorry for disturbing you.

Describe the bug
I try to run tensorboardX/examples/demo_graph.py for jupyter notebook (launched by anaconda navigator) and I get the error seen at Additional context.

I just copy paste the code to notebook from Github.

Minimal runnable code to reproduce the behavior
class SimpleModel(nn.Module):
def init(self):
super(SimpleModel, self).init()

🚀 Feature

let's add more validation checks on what's returned from training_step and provide the user with useful error messages when they're not returning the right values.

Motivation

i feel like i've seen a lot of users confused about what they're supposed to return in training_step and validation_step. additionally, i don't think we document how we treat extra keys as "cal

this doesn't seem very well documented at present.

Split the code from route_method_exception into two separate functions and remove the noqa: C901.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Simplify the function such that no split is required.

Additional context
Code quality:

2020-04-29T13:13:32.5920184Z ./syft/exceptions.py:359:1: C901 'route_method_exception' is too complex (14)
2020-04-29T13:13:32.5920476Z def