unit test coverage is always 0% , even the log shows that "Linter:UnitTest over".

command:
goreporter -p ./ -r /Users/jeffrey -f html
log:

2018/11/11 19:33:45 The template path is not specified,and will use the default template
2018/11/11 19:33:45 There are no packages that are excepted, review all items of the package
2018/11/11 19:33:45 Linter:CountCode over,time consumi

Describe the Bug

I'm having problems with the global mocks configured, I would like to disable them. Could be posible to provide an option in angular.json to disable it?

Minimal Reproduction

I think it isn't needed

Expected Behavior

And option to disable the [mocks ap

https://docs.nose2.io/en/latest/configuration.html#configuration-files is missing a bit of crucial information: what is the name of the .ini file? It looks like it can be both "unittest.cfg" or "nose2.cfg" if I read the code. Is this correct?

Version: 6.7.0+

Ability to simulate methods and yield for events during tests are quite handy. This of course leads to increased time for all tests to pass.

Recently I've figured a nice engine feature that allows to control how fast iterations are run from command line, see godotengine/godot#7269.

I've experimented with these settings:
`godot --fixed-fps 11 --disable-render-loop -d -

Preset Pattern:
1.Application Type -> 2.Bundler -> 3.Test Framework -> 4.Publishing -> 5.CI -> 6.CD

create-ts-lib --preset default  my-package
create-ts-lib --preset minimal my-package

Where

• default
  1.Typescript, 2.Webpack, 3.Karma+Jasmine, 4.Semantic Release, 5.CircleCI
• minimal
  1.Typescript, 2.None, 3.None, 4.None, 5.None

Or

create

Integrate: https://github.com/click-contrib/click-completion

For those of us who didn't come from a Java background and hence weren't exposed to Mockito, the Readme section when() dependency stubbing is maddeningly tantalizing. The obvious question one immediately asks is what if you don't care what the arg values are in the stubbed method? After much web searching and i

@EvgeniiR @peter-gribanov @alexgivi @fox-hellraiser @WoZ @gotterdemarung
Господа, прошу вас о конструктивной критике и доводам по следующим статическим анализаторм psalm vs phpstan vs phan vs (ваш вариант). Хочу помимо idea инспекций / кодстайла добавить более нейтивные валидаторы кода, для запуска например через CI.
Для проверки стиля я предполагаю использовать PHP_CodeSniffer, но для остальног