The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20200906171943/https://github.com/topics/acceptance-testing
Skip to content
#

acceptance-testing

Star

Here are 145 public repositories matching this topic...

Language: All
Filter by language
All 145 Java 24 Ruby 18 Python 14 PHP 13 JavaScript 12 Scala 12 TypeScript 9 C# 6 RobotFramework 5 HTML 4
Sort: Best match
Sort options
Best match Most stars Fewest stars Most forks Fewest forks Recently updated Least recently updated
bigtest

thefrontside / bigtest

Star
Open

`exists` and `absent` interactions should allow ambiguous matches

3
jnicklas
jnicklas commented Aug 31, 2020

The exists and absent interactions currently use unsafeSyncResolve under the hood, just like actions do. However, this isn't ideal. Given the following markup:

<a href="/foo">Foo</a>
<a href="/bar">Foo</a>

We would expect an interactor like this to succeed:

Link("Foo").exists()

However it gets a bit murkier when we get to something like this:

Read more
@bigtest/interactor good first issue question
Find more good first issues →

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the acceptance-testing topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the acceptance-testing topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more

You can’t perform that action at this time.