orm
Here are 2,964 public repositories matching this topic...
ORM for TypeScript and JavaScript (ES7, ES6, ES5). Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Server, Oracle, SAP Hana, WebSQL databases. Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron platforms.
-
Updated
Nov 30, 2020 - TypeScript
The fantastic ORM library for Golang, aims to be developer friendly
-
Updated
Nov 30, 2020 - Go
-
Updated
Nov 18, 2020 - Scala
An powerful enhanced toolkit of MyBatis for simplify development
-
Updated
Dec 1, 2020 - Java
EF Core uses a class Migration, and if you add a new migration with name "Migration" it will break the build.
dotnet ef migrations add Migration
results with Circular base class dependency involving 'Migration' and 'Migration'
I recommend that "migrations add" adds a validation for this...
Include stack traces
Migrations/20201106105308_Migration.cs(6,26): error CS0146: Circul
CakePHP: The Rapid Development Framework for PHP - Official Repository
-
Updated
Nov 30, 2020 - PHP
SQL for Humans™
-
Updated
Aug 12, 2020 - Python
Simple and Powerful ORM for Go, support mysql,postgres,tidb,sqlite3,mssql,oracle, Moved to https://gitea.com/xorm/xorm
-
Updated
Apr 3, 2020 - Go
With #2571 merged diesel now officially supports GROUP BY causes. As mentioned in #210 we have no concrete planes for supporting HAVING clauses in the next release. I've opening this issue to just have one for HAVING clauses + write down some notes for potential contributors. So if anyone is interested in adding support for such clauses feel free to open a PR.
Steps to add support for `HA
A simple Node.js ORM for PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite3 built on top of Knex.js
-
Updated
Sep 22, 2020 - JavaScript
I ran into this when trying to index the id field of all my schemas, which was derived from a base mixin.
I am getting entc/gen: invalid index for schema "User": unknown index field "id" for that field, even though I know it exists and so does the database.
I tested, and this is present when the id field is not provided (default), when it is explicitly defined in the schema, and when it
go-pg doesn't follow any fixed constraint name conventions.
type TestAccess struct {
Id string `pg:"type:uuid,default:uuid_generate_v4()" json:"id"`
BatchId string `pg:"type:uuid,on_delete:CASCADE,unique:batch_id_test_id" json:"batch_id,omitempty"`
Batch *Batch `json:"batch,omitempty"`
StudentId string `pg:"type:uuid,on_delete:CASCADE" json:"student_id,omitemptthe champagne of beta embedded databases
-
Updated
Nov 28, 2020 - Rust
jOOQ is the best way to write SQL in Java
-
Updated
Nov 30, 2020 - Java
what is prefer way to add relation and remove relation? I found example as below, but I did't find any document about the two methods.
case 'ADD_AUTHOR_TO_BOOK':
Book.withId(action.payload.bookId).authors.add(action.payload.author); // add new entity , add relation? this doesn't work.
break;
case 'REMOVE_AUTHOR_FROM_BOOK':
Book.withId(action.payload.bo
File Attachment toolkit for Ruby applications
-
Updated
Nov 30, 2020 - Ruby
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the orm topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the orm topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."


Issue Description
While using model.bulkCreate, as we pass the options, an object which contains transaction, it comes modified after the execution
What are you doing?
We have called bulk