To load dependencies withing a gem/app, require_relative should always be preferred to require

We should check for any instance of (send nil? require `{:__dir__ :__FILE__}) and raise an offense.

I can't event think of a single instance where require should be called with an interpolated string tbh

Affects PMD Version: 6.30.0-SNAPSHOT

Rule:UseTryWithResources

Description:

From pmd/pmd#2871 (comment)

Code Sample demonstrating the issue:

https://chunk.io/pmd/fc7db65b2c6a46eca4c9a0c3012482e2/diff/checkstyle/index.html#A360

import j

Would be good to automatically add a .gitignore to the output dir when creating it, e.g. with contents

# Automatically created by pytype
*

This way people wouldn't need to manually add it to their upper level gitignores. Many tools already do this for their similar dirs, mypy and pytest to name a couple.

This file is enormous. Also, breaking it up will make running tests faster since Gradle can run separate test classes in parallel.

Describe the bug
In the docs found here:
https://bandit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins/index.html#complete-test-plugin-listing

B109 and B111 show a description instead of a plugin name. This looks inconsistent since all the other plugin names are listed. I believe this is a result of a recent change to remove these deprecated plugins.

To Reproduce

1. Navigate to https://bandit

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In a minified JS file, showing the "matched line" will basically mean the whole file is printed. This is pretty painful to navigate around. And since every match in the file is a new finding, the whole file is printed again and again.

Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally, I would like to only show the matched section (

• Larastan Version: 0.6.1
• --level used: 5

Description

In a project that follows DDD, there are usually multiple directories where migration files exist:

database/migrations/*
domains/<domain>/Database/Migrations/*

In these cases it is not possible to configure larastan to scan all the migrations, since the databaseMigrationsPath only accepts a string.

Is there any way to

How can i run findsecbugs rules in spotbugs?

Am i right?

./spotbugs -textui -pluginList /Users/xxx/Downloads/findsecbugs-plugin-1.11.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -home . -low -output ./aaa -progress -train ./bbb -sourcepath ~/Downloads/codez/test/My-Blog/ -debug -noClassOk -progress -auxclasspath ~/Downloads/codez/test/My-Blog/target/ -choosePlugins edu.umd.cs.findbugs.plugins.core

I wrote some of the code to do this in a branch https://github.com/python-security/pyt/compare/class_based_views, but since I'm working on other things and this feature seems cool and important I'm making this issue 👍

Let me know if you would like any help in implementing.

Rubberduck version information
Version 2.5.1.5557
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.14393.0, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Outlook x86
Host Version: 16.0.4266.1001
Host Executable: OUTLOOK.EXE

Description
The event procedures _Itemadd on some collections are marked as "Procedure not used"

To Reproduce
declare

Private WithEvents colCeka As Items
Private WithEvents colDraft