A static analyzer for Java, C, C++, and Objective-C
-
Updated
Dec 12, 2020 - OCaml
{{ message }}
Automate your code review with style, quality, security, and test‑coverage checks when you need them most. Code quality is intended to keep complexity down and runtime up.
A static analyzer for Java, C, C++, and Objective-C
A curated list of static analysis (SAST) tools for all programming languages, config files, build tools, and more.
Checkstyle is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. By default it supports the Google Java Style Guide and Sun Code Conventions, but is highly configurable. It can be invoked with an ANT task and a command line program.
Performant type-checking for python.
A curated list of high quality coding style conventions and standards.
Affects PMD Version: 6.30.0-SNAPSHOT
Rule:UseTryWithResources
Description:
Code Sample demonstrating the issue:
https://chunk.io/pmd/fc7db65b2c6a46eca4c9a0c3012482e2/diff/checkstyle/index.html#A360
import jIt's not just a linter that annoys you!
Code Climate CLI
Copy/paste detector for programming source code.
And, ideally, a configurable list of annotations denoting generated source or AST structures.
See #105 for the kind of issue this seeks to avoid, and the limitations of this fix.
Detect if both possible results of a ternary operator return the same value.
# bad
# (all results below can be replaced by just `a`)
a if ... else a
a if a is not None else None
a if a != b else b
b if a == b else a
# ok
a if ... else c
a.split() if a is not None else None
a if a != b else cIt is either a bug or unnec
AngularJS Material uses gulp to build everything, so we're looking at using https://github.com/ivogabe/gulp-typescript for our builds. It seems like something could be built similar to the webpack plugin in order to have the types added during the Gulp pipeline.
It's not clear if typewiz-node could help with this already or not. We don't have a single main.ts to point to. Should we do somethi
Deprecated; see https://github.com/unused-code/unused
Docker image that provides static analysis tools for PHP
Static code analyzer for TypeScript
Project Guidelines for the Android Buffer App
There is a gap in the docs about managing your installation using github settings and imgbot settings
Main points:
For managing your imgbot installation check out github's docs.
They offer 2 options for managing this. You can select which repositories you want it installed in, or you can choose "all repositories including all future repositories".
You can log in and see your repos and req
PHP_Depend is an adaptation of the established Java development tool JDepend. This tool shows you the quality of your design in terms of extensibility, reusability and maintainability.
let x = { default: 42}; // "default" is highlighted as keyword
ಠ_ಠ Vim plugin to disapprove deeply indented code. ಠ_ಠ
Actionable code coverage - detects untested code blocks in recent changes
A GitHub
app to automatically review Python code style over Pull Requests
Automatically analyze pull request against custom per-project rulesets and best practices
The #1 Test Case Creation and Management for GitHub Workflows
Find and prevent zero-days and other critical bugs, with customizable alerts and automated code review
Automated code reviews to help developers ship better software, faster
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
Restyle Pull Requests as they're opened
A GitHub app that optimizes your images
Insert a public link to a Lucidchart diagram so team members can quickly understand an issue or pull request
Automated code review for GitHub
Code review expert on demand. Automated for mobile and web
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
Ensure that new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. Works with any CI service
Automated code review for technical debt and test coverage
A Benchmarked Definition of Done for Code Quality with BetterCodeHub
Automatic test report merging for all CI and languages into a single code coverage report directly into your pull request
We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through
track_fileswe give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive