| Nov | DEC | Jan |
| 15 | ||
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
COLLECTED BY
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Collection: Archive Team: The Github Hitrub
|
Change GitHub.TeamFoundation.16 version of TeamExplorerServices to use IGitActionsExt2.InitializeOrPushRepositoryToGitService(). This allows the GitHub Extension to take advantage of the Create Repository dialog available in the new Git experience in Visual Studio 16.6. |
Change GitHub.TeamFoundation.16 version of TeamExplorerServices to us…
Loading status checks…
8186791
…e IGitActionsExt2.InitializeOrPushRepositoryToGitService()
Add compiler conditions within ShowPublishSection to only use IGitAct…
Loading status checks…
348122a
…ionsExt2 under 16.0jcansdale reviewed
|
See the question about running on pre-Git experience versions of VS 2019. |
Changes based on PR feedback
Loading status checks…
e0eeacf
Collaborator
Author
|
For what it's worth, I just verified that this works as expected in the latest preview version of Visual Studio 16. |
|
Looks good. LGTM! |
c56f7f2
into
master
|
Before I update to this version, what will happen for those who choose to NOT use the so-called new Git experience? I for one find it incomplete and impossible to even consider using so far. |
|
If you choose not to use the new Git experience, the GitHub Visual Studio extension will direct you to Team Explorer's Sync page, just like it used to. |
|
@daschult Excellent, thank you! |
|
@yannduran Also, I should've asked before, but what features do you find incomplete in the new Git experience? We certainly have our own list of features that we're working on, but if you could provide your own list of missing features that make the new Git experience unusable, then that would help us to prioritize. |
|
@daschult I find it incomplete compared to Team Explorer. Although Team Explorer could benefit from some improvements, many experienced developers, myself included, like the way it works on the whole. I've only tried the new Git Experience a couple of times, because it was so hard to get anything done that I immediately had to switch back to using Team Explorer. Some features were even removed from Team Explorer which really annoyed me. The features in Team Explorer should not have been removed or changed in any way. How are we expected to test your new window out when switching over to it means that we're expected to have to hunt all over Visual Studio to find "other ways" to do basic things that were all together in Team Explorer. Why does it always have to be so binary, one or the other? It would have been far easier if you just made the new window available, without crippling Team Explorer, and see how developers either used it or didn't use it. I actually hope that Team Explorer will remain as an option and not be replaced by something that is dumbed down and makes us less productive. The recent trend of replacing features that just work with new "prettier" but less productive "new experiences" is annoying and completely flawed. I guess I'm just getting sick of these "new experiences" being forced on us when they actually make professional developers less productive. Visual Studio is slowly being crippled by them (anunmodifiable new Start Window, a new search-based New Project dialog. and now the new "Git window"). |
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
None yet
3 participants Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. ●© 2020 GitHub, Inc. ●Terms ●Privacy ● ●Security ●Status ●Help ●Contact GitHub ●Pricing ●API ●Training ●Blog ●About You can’t perform that action at this time. You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.