Java: Remove overwritten NestedType.isStatic() QLDoc
#6797
+6
−15
Conversation
Did not mention nested non-member interfaces and record classes. The documentation of the overridden `isStatic()` predicate already mentions that this predicate holds for explicitly and implicitly static elements, so overwriting it is not necessary and only adds more maintenance work.
Marcono1234
changed the title
NestedType.isStatic() QLDocNestedType.isStatic() QLDoc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
The previous QLDoc did not mention nested non-member interfaces and record classes, see also #5473.
The documentation of the overridden
isStatic()predicate already mentions that this predicate holds for explicitly and implicitly static elements, so overwriting it is not necessary and only adds more maintenance work.(This pull request also includes a formatting fix for the new code I added in #6645)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: