We already have some scripts in the scripts directory. It would be good to run them for every PR.
This is also a great task for beginners.

In our database projects we have several scmp-files with pre-configured schema compares.
As now I can use the files by opening the Schema Compare from the context-menu on the connection, and then click Open .scmp-file.

If I try to open the file from the file explorer or the project explorer I only get the underlaying XML-file, which mostly often isn't very useful.
It would be great to op

The current blue links are sometimes not easy to read, e.g. see the first screenshot from a user vs the second screenshot from my terminal (iTerm2):

![Screen Shot 2021-12-03 at 7 17 55 PM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/638577/144636188-c01e185d-c4eb-4ad8-bfbc-0a8cd8b40fee

The https://github.com/nccgroup/ScoutSuite/blob/master/ScoutSuite/providers/gcp/rules/findings/iam-lack-of-service-account-key-rotation.json finding should only flag USER_MANAGED keys (https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/reference/rest/v1/projects.serviceAccounts.keys), as SYSTEM_MANAGED keys are "managed and rotated by Google"

CKV_AWS_174 is being triggered in our terraform code even though we have the viewer certificate set to use TLSv.1.2. Snippet of our code here:

viewer_certificate {
acm_certificate_arn = aws_acm_certificate.cert.arn
ssl_support_method = "sni-only"
minimum_protocol_version = "TLSv1.2_2019"
}

Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Running checkov on our terraform code

**Expe

Summary

The Event Hubs client library aims to be mockable and fully support testability. To help illustrate usage of the new API for the testing scenarios, a set of samples mocking the various Event Hubs client types and illustrating use of the model factory is needed.

Scope of Work

• Implement a sample or set of samples demonstrating a basic approach for mocking the high level cli

I have a simple regression task (using a LightGBMRegressor) where I want to penalize negative predictions more than positive ones. Is there a way to achieve this with the default regression LightGBM objectives (see https://lightgbm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Parameters.html)? If not, is it somehow possible to define (many example for default LightGBM model) and pass a custom regression objective?

Description

When Remove-AzPolicyExemption is run with -Confirm:$false the cmdlet still ask for confirmation. This is not expected. In additional this cmdlet behaviors also differently than the other Policy cmdlets e.g Remove-AzPolicyAssignment.

If -Confirm:$false is specified the cmdlet should not ask for confirmation anymore.

Issue script & Debug output

N/A

Hi, I read example command here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cli/azure/container?view=azure-cli-latest#examples

and I found wrong command on "Create a container in a container group that runs Windows, with 2 cores and 3.5Gb of memory." Section.

Here your command
az container create -g MyResourceGroup --name myapp --image myimage:latest --ip-address public --ports 8081 --protocol UDP