The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20220408191415/https://github.com/topics/cxx
Skip to content
#

cxx

Star

Here are 419 public repositories matching this topic...

Language: All
Filter by language
All 419 C++ 288 C 25 CMake 16 Python 13 Shell 9 Rust 7 Java 6 Dockerfile 4 HTML 3 Julia 3
Sort: Best match
Sort options
Best match Most stars Fewest stars Most forks Fewest forks Recently updated Least recently updated
thrust

NVIDIA / thrust

Star 3.8k
Open

double promotion warning in thrust

correaa
correaa commented Apr 2, 2022

I changed some compilation parameters of my program and now I see this warning that might be easy to fix.

/usr/local/cuda/bin/../targets/x86_64-linux/include/thrust/detail/complex/catrigf.h: In function 'thrust::complex<float> thrust::detail::complex::casinhf(thrust::complex<float>)':
/usr/local/cuda/bin/../targets/x86_64-linux/include/thrust/detail/complex/catrigf.h:170:36: error: implic
Read more
bug: functional P2: nice to have good first issue
Find more good first issues

google / autocxx

Star 1.5k
Open

Add more tests for array support

adetaylor
adetaylor commented Apr 1, 2022

#969 introduced some support for C++ arrays. So far, we know this works for fields of structs. We should add more tests to find out what happens if we allow arrays as actual function parameters, etc. Pretty sure it won't work because the support for arrays in TypeConverter is incomplete. But, we should find out!

Read more
good first issue
Find more good first issues
cub

NVIDIA / cub

Star 1.1k
Open

Documentation (& code) regarding determining temp_storage_bytes not very clear

2
eyalroz
eyalroz commented Mar 31, 2016

I would like to be able to determine my device-wide primitive's temp_storage_bytes before I have all of the primitive's arguments ready. The interface for obtaining it ostensibly requires everything to be ready for the actual run - and the documentation does not make it clear what arguments it actually needs and what it's going to do with them (e.g. will it look at the input at all, in any way? Pr

Read more
only: docs good first issue

paritytech / cachepot

Star 108
Open

dist: Refactor user namespace overlayfs build mode to not use `fork()`

Xanewok
Xanewok commented Feb 10, 2022

Introduced in #128.

The original reason for that is purely technical - it is required to call unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER) in the main thread of a program. Since cachepot-dist is multi-threaded and the build is executed on a new thread, we used a hack in which we fork() and call unshare in the forked child (fork() forks the calling thread into a main thread of a forked child process).

Us

Read more
good first issue

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the cxx topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the cxx topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more