The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20220408070126/https://github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/issues/758
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

not working with mirrors containing just sources (dsc) #758

Open

manut opened this issue Jul 13, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

not working with mirrors containing just sources (dsc) #758

manut opened this issue Jul 13, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
good first issue

Comments

@manut
Copy link

@manut manut commented Jul 13, 2018

If a mirror just contains source packages, aptly is not able to update it.

aptly always expects that there are binary packages on the mirror.

@manut manut mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2018

Closed
@sliverc
Copy link
Member

@sliverc sliverc commented Jul 13, 2018

Do you know a public repository causing this error?

@smira
Copy link
Member

@smira smira commented Jul 13, 2018

Based on #759 I would imagine this repository has non-empty Architectures: in Release file while no actual indexes per architecture (which is imho problem with the repo).

For a long time we had an option to override the checks via -force-architectures and similar fixes for inconsistency between Architectures: and repo contents.

@smira
Copy link
Member

@smira smira commented Jul 13, 2018

So what I'm going to: is it possible to implement same thing by simply enforcing empty list of architectures (probably requires some change to aptly, as empty list today means "everything that repo has").

@nE0sIghT
Copy link

@nE0sIghT nE0sIghT commented Feb 25, 2020

This is still issue with 1.4.0

@lbolla
Copy link
Member

@lbolla lbolla commented Jan 28, 2022 •
edited

See comment #759 (comment)

Let's just improve the documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@lbolla @smira @sliverc @manut @nE0sIghT