New Issue Checklist

• [ x] Updated SwiftLint to the latest version
• [ x] I searched for existing GitHub issues

Describe the bug

Duplicated Key in Dictionary Literal Violation does not understand #line directive.

Complete output when running SwiftLint, including the stack trace and command used

➜ swiftlint lint

Many repositories need to fix, so please help if you like.

If you could help, it would be helpful if you could comment before starting the work not to overlapping.

Fix example

Run exit command after lint.

echo '::group:: Running golangci-lint with reviewdog 🐶 ...'
go

Expected Behavior of the rule

UnnecessaryAbstractClass should have a concise description like other rules

Context

I just updated Detekt 1.19.0 to 1.20.0 and got this failure:
https://github.com/TWiStErRob/net.twisterrob.cinema/security/code-scanning/227

The message is just plain weird to be this long:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2906988/164910306-4b4478c4-0

We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through track_files we give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).

That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive

Bug description

from abc import abstractmethod, ABCMeta


class WildAnimal(metaclass=ABCMeta):
    @abstractmethod
    def make_sound(self):
        pass


class Panther(WildAnimal):
    def make_sound(self):
        raise NotImplementedError("Panther")


class PantherChild(Panther):
    pass

pylint raise the following error against the code above?

Affects PMD Version: 6.42.0

Rule: ApexCRUDViolation

Description:
I'm getting the "Validate CRUD permission before SOQL/DML operation" error when updating a list of a custom object, but not on the individual.

Code Sample demonstrating the issue:

public static CustomObject__c updateCu

Rule request

Thesis

Forbid ast.Is in ast.Compare.ops when it's size is not zero. For example:

a = None
a is None           # True, as expected
a is None is True   # False 🤔
a is None == True   # False 🤔
a is None is None   # True 🤯 

Reasoning

From the AST perspective, is is an operator and can be chained. That can lead to unexpected results when the autho

Piranha transforms:

someConsumer.accept((x) -> { 
                                        if(exp.isTreated(STALE_FLAG)){
                                           doSomething(x);
                                        }
                                        else{
                                           domeSomethingElse(x);
                                        }
           

I understand that optimisation of image/x-icon files has been added to Magick.NET (dlemstra/Magick.NET@c5e41c5). Are there any chances of this being added to Imgbot?

This has been requested before in #444, unfortunately, that issue has become stale without any comments whatsoever.