Amazon Web Services

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched existing issues, it hasn't been reported yet

Use case description

Currently, we have websocket-related properties configured directly on provider level:

• provider.websocketsApiName
• provider.websocketsApiRouteSelectionExpression
• provider.websocketsDescription

This is not consistent with how iam, httpApi or

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

When running batch-write-item and request-items is missing the primary key and/or the sort key for a given table it returns 500 meaning that any sdk will try again before exhausting retries and hiding the true ValidationException error.

Expected Behavior

Return `ValidationExce

We already have some scripts in the scripts directory. It would be good to run them for every PR.
This is also a great task for beginners.

Small feature request. I am using helmfile for the deployment of our k8s infrastructure and wanted to use sops for encryption of secrets. I need to use the --keyservice but as I am calling sops inside a wrapper (helmfile) of a wrapper (helm secrets) I cannot pass this variable to sops in a clean way.

Could you provide an alternative way to provide this option to sops in the .sops.conf and/or i

Describe the issue

Navigate to the following section https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/api/v2/docs/aws-cdk-lib.aws_ecs_patterns-readme.html#set-capacityproviderstrategies-for-queueprocessingec2service

... and you'll find the heading Set capacityProviderStrategies for QueueProcessingEc2Service ...

... the example is clearly for configuring a QueueProcessingFargateService

Links

Before opening, please confirm:

• I have searched for duplicate or closed issues and discussions.
• I have read the guide for submitting bug reports.
• I have done my best to i

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions

azurerm_app_service is being deprecated in favor of

azurerm_linux_web_app and azurerm_windows_web_app whic

General Availability (GA) for docker compose v2 is "Almost There". With GA we could consider upgrading docker compose examples (sample project and [test](https://github.com/