Hi,

It seems like the HTTP Assert package does not allow me to specify a body to pass in a POST request for example. Looking at the HTTPBody() function, the body argument is set to nil:
req, err := http.NewRequest(method, url+"?"+values.Encode(), nil)

Is this by design, or am I looking at a missing feature?

Cheers,

https://github.com/kotest/kotest/blob/b47f92247e12bdb43617c762950ed1f392e0afe1/kotest-assertions/kotest-assertions-core/src/commonMain/kotlin/io/kotest/matchers/result/matchers.kt#L62

Currently, a test that tests for

a shouldBeSuccess b

will fail if a is Failure (as expected).

What it won't do is print what was the failure, so there's no way to debug other than, well, debug

Description

Nested AssertionScopes only report the outer-most scope reportables on failure. This is true regardless of whether the outer scope has any reportables -- i.e., if only the inner scope has reportables, nothing is reported.

Complete minimal example reproducing the issue

[TestMethod]
public void TestNestedAssertionScopes()
{
    using (var outerScope = new A

Checklist

• Feature request has a meaningful title
• I have searched the existing issues. See all issues
• I have tested using the latest version of Pester. See Installation and update guide.

Summary of the feature request

Hi,

we are internally using Gitlab

Using the existing matches(Pattern) and POSIX regex character classes, we can add specialized assertions to AbstractCharSequenceAssert.

assertThat(string).isAlphabetic();   // \p{Alpha}
assertThat(string).isAlphanumeric(); // \p{Alnum}
assertThat(string).isASCII();        // \p{ASCII}
assertThat(string).isDigit();        // \p{Digit}
assertThat(string).isHexadecimal();  // \p{X

Describe the bug
pa.errors.SchemaErrors.failure_cases only returns the first 10 failure_cases

• I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
• I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandera. 0.6.5
• (optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandera.

Note: Please read [this guide](https://matthewrocklin.c

As a SDET
I want a documentation or Wiki page where the expected vs actual field matching is explained
So that I can use these in my test automation to test the server response payloads and headers
e.g. id=123 , id="123", isValid=true, isValid="true" etc

AC1:

Cover the following currently supported mechanisms with examples

• $EQ
• (int)
• (float) or (decimal)
• (boolean)

While working on a fix for frankban/quicktest#125 it appeared that there could be an opportunity for improving the Not(Checker) error message for standard checkers, such as Equals, IsTrue etc.

Platform (all, jvm, js): all
Extension (none, kotlin 1.3): none

Code related feature

Would be nicer to have the build file in Kotlin instead of groovy

Your first contribution?

• Write a comment I'll work on this if you would like to take this issue over.
  This way we get the chance to revise the description in case things have changed in the meantime, we might give you addi

Normally, the "to be truthy" assertion does not take any value as it simply asserts that a subject can be coerced to a boolean true (in the case of "to be falsy" it is coercion to boolean false).

It seems that early on these assertions inherited an optional form where a custom message can be supplied as their argument - this was likely inspired by earlier assertions frameworks (assert on node