Wayback Machine
21 captures
21 Jun 2023 - 14 Dec 2025
Mar APR May
27
2023 2024 2025
success
fail

About this capture

COLLECTED BY

Organization: Archive Team

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.

History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.

The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.

This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.

Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.

The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.

Collection: ArchiveBot: The Archive Team Crowdsourced Crawler

ArchiveBot is an IRC bot designed to automate the archival of smaller websites (e.g. up to a few hundred thousand URLs). You give it a URL to start at, and it grabs all content under that URL, records it in a WARC, and then uploads that WARC to ArchiveTeam servers for eventual injection into the Internet Archive (or other archive sites).

To use ArchiveBot, drop by #archivebot on EFNet. To interact with ArchiveBot, you issue commands by typing it into the channel. Note you will need channel operator permissions in order to issue archiving jobs. The dashboard shows the sites being downloaded currently.

There is a dashboard running for the archivebot process at http://www.archivebot.com.

ArchiveBot's source code can be found at https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/ArchiveBot.

TIMESTAMPS
loading
The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20240427201005/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Virtues
Jump to content
Main menu
Navigation
  • Main page
  • Contents
  • Current events
  • Random article
  • About Wikipedia
  • Contact us
  • Donate
  • Contribute
    • Help
  • Learn to edit
  • Community portal
  • Recent changes
  • Upload file
  • Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia
    Search
    • Create account
  • Log in
    • Create account
  • Log in
  • Pages for logged out editors learn more
    • Contributions
  • Talk
  • Contents

    • (Top)
  • 1Please be inclusive and ecumenical
    6 comments
  • Template talk:Virtues

    Page contents not supported in other languages.
    • Template
  • Talk
    • Read
  • Edit
  • Add topic
  • View history
  • Tools
    Actions
    • Read
  • Edit
  • Add topic
  • View history
  • General
    • What links here
  • Related changes
  • Upload file
  • Special pages
  • Permanent link
  • Page information
  • Get shortened URL
  • Download QR code
  • Print/export
    • Download as PDF
  • Printable version
  • From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
    It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
    WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Ethics
    WikiProject icon
    • Philosophy portal
    This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
    Associated task forces:
    / 
    Taskforce icon
    Ethics
    WikiProject iconReligion
    WikiProject icon
    • iconReligion portal
    This template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles

    Please be inclusive and ecumenical[edit]

    @Trakking — I appreciate your attention to improving the formatting of this list, but I'm concerned that you seem to be purging items (e.g. Civility, Clemency, Curiosity, Determination, Grit... etc.) based on some particular definition of what a virtue is rather than on a more inclusive and ecumenical point of view that encompasses a variety of virtue systems. Moorlock (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello. I provided many explanations for my removals.
    Civility is defined as "formal politeness and courtesy in behaviour or speech"—and the list already includes adequate entries to politeness and courtesy. Also—the article for civility is quite obscure with only two articles in other languages etc.
    Clemency was linked to the irrelevant judicial term "pardon." Mercy, which is already included, is an excellent synonym for clemency, just like courage is a more adequate term than grit.
    Another problem concerned neutral terms. Traits like creativity, curiosity, ambition may be attributed to many criminals and psychopaths, whereas true virtues like Honour, Duty, Sportsmanship, Wisdom are reserved for virtuous people. Virtue is defined as "behaviour showing high moral standards."
    The list is extensive enough as it is now. It just needed a cleanup, removing irrelevant terms and following the principle of putting quality over quantity. Trakking (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Your particular definition of virtue as "behaviour showing high moral standards" is the problem here. There are other definitions of virtue, such as the classical Greek idea of a virtue as "a characteristic habit tending to the human flourishing of the person exhibiting it." This list should respect that definition as well. —Moorlock (talk) 18:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    All authoritative definitions and interpretations of virtue, from the Greeks through the Middle Ages to modern time, contain a moral and social dimension. What you talk about is closer to concepts like Bildung and self-actualization. Trakking (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Aristotle is about as authoritative as an author can be on the subject of virtues, and he doesn't agree. Some of the virtues he elaborated on, like wittiness, ambition, magnanimity, or magnificence, wouldn't make a cut based on having-a-moral-dimension or showing-high-moral-standards. That's one reason why I think your standard of what counts as a virtue is too strict or too bound to one particular tradition and should not be the standard by which this list is crafted. —Moorlock (talk) 23:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If you have not noticed, wit, magnanimity, and magnificence are still included in the template—and for good reasons. There’s normally a social and moral dimension to these traits, like being witty/humorous in a conversation or showing magnificence by hosting an expensive event.
    Ambition, however, not so much. The introduction to the article of ambition explicitly states: ”It has been categorized both as a virtue and as a vice.” Aristotle believed in moderated ambition: industriousness, which is one of the aspects of Conscientiousness along with orderliness. That term is already covered in the template. Trakking (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Virtues&oldid=1182546329"
    Categories:
    • Template-Class Philosophy articles
  • NA-importance Philosophy articles
  • Template-Class ethics articles
  • NA-importance ethics articles
  • Ethics task force articles
  • Template-Class Religion articles
  • NA-importance Religion articles
  • WikiProject Religion articles
    • This page was last edited on 30 October 2023, at 00:01 (UTC).
  • Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
    • Privacy policy
    • About Wikipedia
    • Disclaimers
    • Contact Wikipedia
    • Code of Conduct
    • Developers
    • Statistics
    • Cookie statement
    • Mobile view
    • Wikimedia Foundation
    • Powered by MediaWiki