●Stories
●Firehose
●All
●Popular
●Polls
●Software
●Thought Leadership
Submit
●
Login
●or
●
Sign up
●Topics:
●Devices
●Build
●Entertainment
●Technology
●Open Source
●Science
●YRO
●Follow us:
●RSS
●Facebook
●LinkedIn
●Twitter
●
Youtube
●
Mastodon
●Bluesky
Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!
Forgot your password?
Close
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Load All Comments
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
/Sea
Score:
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
More
Login
Forgot your password?
Close
Close
Log In/Create an Account
●
All
●
Insightful
●
Informative
●
Interesting
●
Funny
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
byDripdry ( 1062282 ) writes:
The pcie riser I have on order from China was supposed to be on the way... Wonder how that will turn out.
Well, no homelab for anybody now!
bytimeOday ( 582209 ) writes:
What's the problem? This will spur a great resurgence in American manufacturing of small low-value electronic components and you'll get your parts, perhaps as soon as 4-10 years from now.
byfenrif ( 991024 ) writes:
Imagine a leader of a country worrying about things in the future and not basing everything he does on the short term immediacy? The horror!
That's not how boomers think at all. This is new and scary and strange!
bybickerdyke ( 670000 ) writes:
Yes. But a good leader would at least try not to dump the country into a reign of chaos while transitioning.
Stick with the tariff example...
A "resurgence of American manufacturing" is a good idea. Tariffs can be a part of such a move. But you need to make sure that American industries are able to take over the production of previously imported goods. Otherwise it's just raising prices and thus driving up inflation.
Again, you may be able to sit through that, but only if the inflation wasn't already skyrocketing.
So yes, good leaders would set tariffs. But raising tariffs without the necessary preparation is bad leadership.
And that's Trump. Even the good(*) things he did in his first term made him look like a 5 year old with a tamper tantrum and not like any kind of leader.
(*) well, the not-bad(**) things
(**) or probably the not-as-bad-as-expected things...
Parent
twitter
facebook
byCubicleZombie ( 2590497 ) writes:
Yes. But a good leader would at least try not to dump the country into a reign of chaos while transitioning.
That's not what he's doing. In a few days the flow of cheap crap from China will resume and something else - like the flow of fentanyl - will stop. Art of the Deal, his book - throw out something outrageous to your opponent so that they'll settle on something that's reasonable.
Trump is not going to take back the Panama Canal or annex Greenland. But he will get a better deal for American shippers and get the U.S. base in Greenland expanded before Putin goes totally off the rails.
bybickerdyke ( 670000 ) writes:
Sorry, but 5 minutes ago the newsticker was that USPS stopped stopping delivering Chinese parcels. Just a few hours after announcing that they won't do it anymore because some wiseguy had a brainfart of changing freight custom rules without any plan for preparation or transition. That isthe definition of chaos. Government workers not knowing if policies are going to be the same tomorrow.
Yes, ending the small value tariff exemption is probably a good idea. Europe is working on the same thing. But the differ
bytlhIngan ( 30335 ) writes:
Yes, ending the small value tariff exemption is probably a good idea. Europe is working on the same thing. But the difference will be a much smoother transition and probably less new loopholes due to better (or at least SOME!!) planning.
It isn't, actually. However, it is useful to note the exemption in the US is ridiculous - it's $800. Items $800 and less are not subject to duties (and taxes).. In most other countries, it's around $20-50.
This exemption Icalled "de minimus") is meant to apply to low-value go
bybickerdyke ( 670000 ) writes:
Lowering the tariff free amount is exactly what the EU is working on, too. Even if it is already much lower, but $20-50 still gets you lots of toxic plastic waste on temu...
But my point was that they are making a plan before putting it into action, to avoid what happend in the US today.
byfortfive ( 1582005 ) writes:
> something else - like the flow of fentanyl - will stop.
Terrible example. Nothing has ever stopped the slow of drugs in any form, and nothing ever will, that's just how humanity works.
It's unfortunate you picked that example, because there is potential merit to the approach.
It does depend on a number of things being true, one of which that your trade partner needs you at least a much as you need them. Perhaps China will adapt by increasing the flow of drugs, which are probably more lucrative anyway.
bydenelson83 ( 841254 ) writes:
Or annex Canada? He has said that too.
byMajor_Disorder ( 5019363 ) writes:
Or annex Canada? He has said that too.
As a Canadian. Any attempt to "Annex Canada" will be a bloodbath.
byDru Nemeton ( 4964417 ) writes:
You seem to be unaware that Mr. "Art of the Deal" immediately suspended his tariffs on Canada and Mexico once they agreed to 'comply' and...wait for it...do exactly what they said they would do when Biden was president! Not only that, but the president of Mexico got Mr. "Art of the Deal" to agree to a concession from her, that wasn't included in the Biden deal.
With 'deals' like that are you sure we shouldn't 'buy' the Panama Canal and/or Greenland and/or Gaza and/or Mexico and/or Canada just outright? Thi
● current threshold.
byKing_TJ ( 85913 ) writes:
Actually? It's the reign of chaos that's the brilliance exhibited here. The status quo in America for decades has been a leader throwing one big change out there at a time, followed by a pause long enough so the press/media gets months to criticize it, exaggerate its possible outcomes, hyper-focus on details that don't ultimately matter, misrepresent parts of it, etc. So eventually, it all gets dumbed down or even scrapped, or gets passed with a lot of unwarranted dissent, so is on the chopping block when l
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Slashdot
●
●
Submit Story
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
-- Roy Santoro
●FAQ
●Story Archive
●Hall of Fame
●Advertising
●Terms
●Privacy Statement
●About
●Feedback
●Mobile View
●Blog
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...
Working...