Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Nuclear photonic rocket: Difference between revisions





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

View history  

Edit  






Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 150074810 by Tmayes1999 (talk) nonsense edit
Line 11:
 
If a Photon rocket begins its journey in low earth orbit, then 1 year of thrusting may be required to achieve an earth escape velocity of 12.5 km/s if the vehicle is already in orbit
at a velocity of 9,100 m/s, and 400 m/s additional velocity is obtained from the east to west rotation of the earth. The Photon thrust will be sufficient to more thenthan counterbalance
the pull of the sunssun's gravity, allowing the photon rocket to maintain a heliocentric velocity
of 30 km/s in interplanetary space upon escaping the earth's gravitational field.
Eighty years of steady phontonic thrusting would be then required to obtain a final velocity
of 240 km/s in this hypothetical case . At a 30 km/s heliocentric velocity , the photon ship would recede a distance of 600,000,000 miles from the sun per year .
 
It is possible to obtain even higher specific impulse; that of some other photonic propulsion devices (e.g., [[solar sail]]s) is effectively infinite because no carried fuel is required. Alternatively, such devices as [[ion thruster]]s, while having a notably lower specific impulse, give a much better thrust-to-power ratio:; for photons, that ratio is <math>1/c</math>, whereas for slow particles (that is, nonrelativistic; even the output from typical ion thrusters counts) the ratio is <math>2/v</math>, which is much larger (since <math>v\ll c</math>). (This is in a sense an unfair comparison, since the photons must be ''created'' and other particles are merely ''accelerated'', but nonetheless the impulses per carried mass and per applied energy &mdash; the practical quantities &mdash; are as given.) The photonic rocket is thus wasteful when power and not mass is at a premium, or when enough mass can be saved through the use of a weaker power source that reaction mass can be included without penalty.
 
A laser could be used as a photon rocket engine, and would solve the reflection/collimation problem, but lasers are absolutely less efficient at converting energy into light than blackbody radiation is - Though one should also note the benefits of lasers vs blackbody source, including unidirectional controllable beam and the mass and durability of the radiation source.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_photonic_rocket"
 




Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia




Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop