![]() | Food and drink Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
I am merging this with Wet aged beef. That article repeats parts of this one, they deal with pretty much the same topic and cite the same sources. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Foodorone of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Beef on aging racks would be good, like this wet aging imageorthis dry aging image... this is aged beef, just before cooking (something good for the top of the page, independent of dry or wet. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
It is requested that a photographofWet-agingbeincluded in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
An image of wet-aging would be good. 64.229.100.45 (talk) 08:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
What does "higher grades of meat" mean in "Also, only the higher grades of meat can be dry aged,..."? It seems to imply greater fat-to-meat ratio, but it's unclear
--Limited Atonement (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
The guy who wrote this article does a good job of exploding some of the myths about dry aging:
http://www.seriouseats.com/2013/03/the-food-lab-complete-guide-to-dry-aging-beef-at-home.html
In particular, he only measured 3-5% density loss, not the 30% claimed in this wiki entry.