Talk:Campanology: Difference between revisions

''moved here from [[User_talk:SomeHuman#Moved|SomeHuman's talk page]] (title: Campanology'')<br>Hey, sorry to have missed the huge removal of info on this page. Hope that I can help make it better and I'm glad you recovered the missing details. Hope we can work together soon. [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 19:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

:The omissions by a third party had forced me to revert to my former version and (besides some further work) I tried to get all your edits back in. Hope I didn't miss one. I would like to get the external links where these belong: there is a single link for each type of bell instrument, and a series of links for British bells and bell-ringing (which seems to have been the original article's subject but the article name is much more general). The whole page gives merely a summary of the different types of bell instruments &ndash; a proper 'Campanology' page should also have something on (casting) and tuning of bells, and on compositions (for each kind of instrument if to be found &ndash; the bell-ringing cycle, which can hardly be called a composition, is all we've got so far). Sinced the page should not be a thorough article (there are already several types of bell instruments that have a proper one &ndash; there might already exist one about the fabrication/tuning of bells as well) but just a general overview of the different aspects, I had put the links within each clear-cut chapter. The only other reasonable solution would be creating under 'External links' an identical subtitle with its link(s). But that gives problems: linking requires unique names. You didn't offend me by moving the links but it feels wrong to put them together, here drowning the few within the many and contrasting with the sharp distinction between chapters. You did as one should for a more continuous article of which a link often leads to more than one aspect handled on different places in the article. If you find a way to fluently put each link in some sentence in the proper chapter, be my guest. I didn't encounter this kind of link problem in any other article so far, perhaps we spot some elegant solution elsewhere. -- [[User:SomeHuman|SomeHuman]] 2006-06-26 23:10 (UTC)