|
|
|
||
Line 116:
On the other hand we have [[Human Geography]] and that is a branch of geography that focuses on the study of patterns and processes that shape human interaction with various environments. It encompasses human, political, cultural, social, and economic aspects. While the major focus of human geography is not the physical landscape of the Earth (see physical geography), it is hardly possible to discuss human geography without referring to the physical landscape on which human activities are being played out, and environmental geography is emerging as a link between the two.
The reality is that, in light of these two spheres of Geography, both sides of this debate are correct and the reason we are failing to come to any common ground on the subject is because we are stuck on the geographical issues described above. Tvoz, I like your new header which reads, “This article is about the area of Massachusetts known as ‘Cape Cod’.” However, I’m going to propose we go a step beyond that. I am going to suggest that we have two articles on Cape Cod – one on Cape Cod’s [[Physical geography]] and one on [[Human Geology]]. To do so would accurately describe both views and resolve this deliberation. It would also allow the user of Wikipedia to get a fuller understanding of the area we are all so clearly in love with – Cape Cod. What say ye?[[User:Leftshore|Leftshore]]
| |||