|
→Requested move 12 June 2019: support
|
→Requested move 12 June 2019: comment
|
||
Line 244:
*'''Oppose'''. It might be reasonable to split off an article about Carob as a cooking ingredient (a la [[chocolate]]/[[Theobroma cacao]]). Are readers actually being harmed by having the scientific name as the title of an article covering carob as an ingredient and the plant species? [[User:Plantdrew|Plantdrew]] ([[User talk:Plantdrew|talk]]) 05:08, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
*'''Support''' as more [[WP:CRITERIA|recognizable, natural, and concise]]. Also meets the criteria given in [[WP:NCFLORA]] for using non-scientific name (is of significant interest in fields outside botany). When the article title is X but the prose of the article overwhelmingly refers to the subject as Y, that strikes me as a red flag. [[User:Colin M|Colin M]] ([[User talk:Colin M|talk]]) 06:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per nom, No such user, and Colin M. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 11:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||