Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Talk:Elizabeth II: Difference between revisions





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

View history  

Edit  






Browse history interactively
 Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=15|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{FAQ}}
{{British English|date=September 2010}}
Line 130:
{{Top 25 Report|Jul 21 2013|May 3 2015|Sep 6 2015|Apr 17 2016|Oct 30 2016|until|Jan 15 2017|Apr 30 2017|Nov 26 2017|until|Jan 28 2018|Apr 15 2018|Apr 22 2018|May 13 2018|until|May 27 2018|Nov 17 2019|until|Dec 8 2019|Dec 22 2019|Jan 5 2020|Jan 12 2020|Apr 5 2020|Nov 15 2020|until|Jan 10 2021|Feb 14 2021|Feb 28 2021|until|Apr 25 2021|Jun 6 2021|Jan 9 2022|Feb 6 2022|Feb 20 2022|May 29 2022|Jun 5 2022|Sep 4 2022|until|Oct 2 2022|Nov 13 2022|Apr 30 2023|May 7 2023|Dec 17 2023}}
{{annual readership|scale=log}}
{{section size}}
{{Old moves
|title1=Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom
Line 165 ⟶ 166:
::Consensus can change. It's not uncommon to revisit a discussion from over 12 months ago. Particularly one where 'I don't like it' triumphed over 'multiple sources say this'. [[User:Celia Homeford|Celia Homeford]] ([[User talk:Celia Homeford|talk]]) 10:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Previous consensus was not the point raised or referred to. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 13:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
::::"This was already discussed before & the consensus was to ''exclude'' any surname" = previous consensus raised and referred to. [[User:Celia Homeford|Celia Homeford]] ([[User talk:Celia Homeford|talk]]) 13:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Celia Homeford}} apologies, I thought you were replying to me. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 18:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Ok fair enough; thanks for the link. I didn't recall that there had been an RFC since it was a while ago. Just saw some royals' full names come up recently in the news. No problem. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 13:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 
== Main Photo ==
Line 191 ⟶ 195:
::The last RFC voted for this one by a vote, as I recall, of 16 to 12. A year is long enough for minds to change or new views to come from new editors. I see nothing wrong with a new RFC.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
:::+1, consensus can change over time. A new RfC would not be against policy.--'''''[[User:ianmacm|<span style="background:#88b;color:#cff;font-variant:small-caps">♦Ian<span style="background:#99c">Ma<span style="background:#aad">c</span></span>M♦</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ianmacm|(talk to me)]]</sup>''''' 06:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
:We've already been through this, multiple times. The 1959 image is what got consensus. PS - I highly doubt you'd get a consensus to replace the image, waswith a portrait. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 10:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
::completely understandable, but I think you misunderstood what was being said. there was no discussion to replace the current photo with a portrait, rather confusion over whether the current image was a photograph or a painting. [[User:Waverland|Waverland]] ([[User talk:Waverland|talk]]) 15:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
:::All that is needed is the same level of consensus that got this on the page, that is a majority vote in a preference poll. [[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 16:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] Can I ask what you mean by "I highly doubt you'd get a consensus to replace the image, with a portrait"
::Do you mean with replacing the current (1959) image with a Painting/Drawing?
::(And to clarify, part of the reason why I was opposed to the 1959 image in the first place was because I originally thought it was a Painting/Drawn portrait [[User:Pepper Gaming|Pepper Gaming]] ([[User talk:Pepper Gaming|talk]]) 11:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
:::A photo is better than a painting. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 17:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
::::I agree, I was opposed to the 1959 image for a long time because I thought it was a Painting or a Drawn portrait. [[User:Pepper Gaming|Pepper Gaming]] ([[User talk:Pepper Gaming|talk]]) 10:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
::::A photo is also better than something that's easily mistaken as a painting. [[User:Ric36|Ric36]] ([[User talk:Ric36|talk]]) 17:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 
== Religion ==

Add topic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Elizabeth_II"
 




Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia




Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop